Brokeback Mountain Forum @ ennisjack.com

The Movie & Story => News Coverage, Reviews & Awards => Topic started by: Icarus512 on Mar 24, 2006, 04:04 AM

Title: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Icarus512 on Mar 24, 2006, 04:04 AM

Actor Randy Quaid has reportedly taken legal action against the producers of Brokeback Mountain, saying he was duped into accepting less money for his work.
He alleges Focus Features persuaded him to defer his normal pay by misrepresenting the project as a low-budget film, according to Variety.

Producers James Schamus and David Linde retained his services on "economically unfavourable" terms, he has claimed.

Quaid, 55, is suing for $10m (£5.7m). A Focus spokeswoman declined to comment.

"Randy Quaid is an instantly recognisable household name and much-admired actor on the world's stage with a worldwide box office total of nearly $2 billion (£1.1bn)," reads the legal action filed at Los Angeles Superior Court on Thursday.

'Movie laundering'

"Defendants were engaging in a 'movie laundering' scheme designed to obtain the services of talent... for a picture that, in reality, had studio backing and would be exploited using traditional studio marketing and distribution techniques."

Brokeback Mountain won three Academy Awards in March and has made nearly $160m (£92m) worldwide, according to trade newspaper Variety.

Quaid's action - which also names Del Mar Productions as a defendant - does not state what he was actually paid for playing the role of ranch manager Joe Aguirre.

The actor's other films include Kingpin, Independence Day and Not Another Teen Movie.


source: BBC news
Title: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: rod1960 on Mar 24, 2006, 06:58 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4840068.stm
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: bram on Mar 24, 2006, 07:19 AM
That is so stupid. I have no clue what he got paid or what he usually gets paid, but no matter what it's still just stupid.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on Mar 24, 2006, 08:14 AM
10 million dollars?  ???  C'mon.
The others did their homework regarding the film and it's potential.  Why didn't he?
I'm surprised he didn't work out some type of royalties deal as compensation for his normal salary.

This is going to be interesting.
Title: Randy Quaid Sues BBM Producers.
Post by: Jennis on Mar 24, 2006, 11:43 AM
How sad that it has to come down to money on his part.I don't think i can watch him in BBM in the same light now. :(

Hugs
Jennis.x(Two articles below.)


Quaid Says He Was Duped into 'Brokeback' Role
 
(CBS) LOS ANGELES Oscar-nominated actor Randy Quaid alleges he was underpaid for his supporting role in "Brokeback Mountain," according to a $10 million lawsuit he filed Thursday against the film's producers.

Quaid, 55, claims producers James Schamus and David Linde, through Focus Features and Del Mar Productions, convinced him to be in the award-winning film for "effectively a donation of his time" by "falsely representing it as a low-budget, art house film, with no prospect of making any money."

A message left with a representative for Focus Features, seeking comment on the allegations, was not immediately returned.

Quaid played the rancher who gives jobs to Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) and Ennis del Mar (Heath Ledger), the cowboys who fall in love in the film.

According to his Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, Quaid has a long history of appearing "at reduced rates" in experimental, non-mainstream films for art's sake, as opposed to their likelihood to be a box office hit.

However, he contends he was misled because the film allegedly always was planned as a larger-budget movie that would be given a worldwide release and supported as a studio picture.

Quaid actor is seeking at least $10 million in damages on claims that include intentional and negligent misrepresentation.

Quaid's other credits include "Independence Day," "Kingpin," "The Ice Harvest," "Elvis," and the upcoming "Goya's Ghosts." He received a best supporting actor Academy Award nomination for the 1973 film "The Last Detail."

Link to original source.

http://cbs2.com/entertainment/local_story_082205533.html#



Randy Quaid Sues Over 'Brokeback'

Actor claims producers defrauded him
By TMZ.COM STAFF

(Mar. 23) -- Randy Quaid has filed a lawsuit claiming he was done in by producers of 'Brokeback Mountain.'


TMZ obtained a copy of the lawsuit, filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, claiming producers falsely represented the movie to him as \"a low-budget, art house film, with no prospect of making any money.\" Qauid claims the representations were a ruse from the beginning. 'Brokeback' has grossed around $160 million.


Quaid's suit claims that in 2004, he met with director Ang Lee, who offered him the role of Joe Aguirre. The suit alleges that Lee told Quaid: "We can't pay anything, we have very little money, everyone is making a sacrifice to make this film."


The suit does not specifically state how much Quaid made, but it does claim that the defendants "were engaged in a 'movie laundering' scheme designed to obtain the services of talent such as Randy Quaid on economically unfavorable art film terms..."


The suit asks for $10 million in damages as well as punitive damages. It also seeks "restitution for all ill-gotten gains."


Link to original source.

http://tmz.aol.com/article2?id=20060323195809990001

 
Title: Randy Quaid, what a jerk
Post by: tireiron on Mar 24, 2006, 12:21 PM
(from rec.arts.movies.current-films on usenet)

http://tmz.aol.com/article2?id=20060323195809990001

Like so many political people these days, Mr. Quaid's great hindsight
makes him think everyone else had foresight that he didn't have.  What
a shame if he wins this lawsuit, which would have a crippling effect on
future projects seen as risks at the outset.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: cara1158 on Mar 24, 2006, 12:22 PM
"Randy Quaid is an instantly recognisable household name and much-admired actor on the world's stage with a worldwide box office total of nearly $2 billion (£1.1bn)..."

Now there's an overstatement if I ever heard one.  Makes Randy Quaid sound like Sir Lawrence Olivier...  LOL
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on Mar 24, 2006, 12:32 PM
As long as Randy's been in the business, you would think he would know how to cover his a-- by now.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: chrissy323 on Mar 24, 2006, 12:35 PM
"Randy Quaid is an instantly recognisable household name and much-admired actor on the world's stage with a worldwide box office total of nearly $2 billion (£1.1bn)..."

Now there's an overstatement if I ever heard one.  Makes Randy Quaid sound like Sir Lawrence Olivier...  LOL

I'd always mistaken him for Sir Olivier in all those National Lampoon moives........
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: Toadily on Mar 24, 2006, 02:44 PM
Randy Quaid Sues Over 'Brokeback'
Actor claims producers defrauded him

http://tmz.aol.com/article2?id=20060323195809990001

By TMZ.COM STAFF
(Mar. 23) -- Randy Quaid has filed a lawsuit claiming he was done in by producers of 'Brokeback Mountain.'

TMZ obtained a copy of the lawsuit, filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, claiming producers falsely represented the movie to him as \"a low-budget, art house film, with no prospect of making any money.\" Qauid claims the representations were a ruse from the beginning. 'Brokeback' has grossed around $160 million.

Quaid's suit claims that in 2004, he met with director Ang Lee, who offered him the role of Joe Aguirre. The suit alleges that Lee told Quaid: "We can't pay anything, we have very little money, everyone is making a sacrifice to make this film."

The suit does not specifically state how much Quaid made, but it does claim that the defendants "were engaged in a 'movie laundering' scheme designed to obtain the services of talent such as Randy Quaid on economically unfavorable art film terms..."

The suit asks for $10 million in damages as well as punitive damages. It also seeks "restitution for all ill-gotten gains."


I am surprised he would do this, it seems unwise.  I mean he would likely get more parts based on brokeback, so
I personally would take it as lucky I was in it, rather than start to get reputations as difficult.  You know what I mean?
I doubt Ang was trying to deceive him, he just had limited moneys and I am sure someone else would have gladly done
the part...
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 02:53 PM
Randy Quaid Sues Over 'Brokeback'
Actor claims producers defrauded him

http://tmz.aol.com/article2?id=20060323195809990001

By TMZ.COM STAFF
(Mar. 23) -- Randy Quaid has filed a lawsuit claiming he was done in by producers of 'Brokeback Mountain.'

TMZ obtained a copy of the lawsuit, filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, claiming producers falsely represented the movie to him as \"a low-budget, art house film, with no prospect of making any money.\" Qauid claims the representations were a ruse from the beginning. 'Brokeback' has grossed around $160 million.

Quaid's suit claims that in 2004, he met with director Ang Lee, who offered him the role of Joe Aguirre. The suit alleges that Lee told Quaid: "We can't pay anything, we have very little money, everyone is making a sacrifice to make this film."

The suit does not specifically state how much Quaid made, but it does claim that the defendants "were engaged in a 'movie laundering' scheme designed to obtain the services of talent such as Randy Quaid on economically unfavorable art film terms..."

The suit asks for $10 million in damages as well as punitive damages. It also seeks "restitution for all ill-gotten gains."


I am surprised he would do this, it seems unwise.  I mean he would likely get more parts based on brokeback, so
I personally would take it as lucky I was in it, rather than start to get reputations as difficult.  You know what I mean?
I doubt Ang was trying to deceive him, he just had limited moneys and I am sure someone else would have gladly done
the part...

I think he sort of forgot that the Producers and the Studio did in fact take the risk.  It could have ended up a flop.  How would they know?  Hollywood didn't want to take the risk for 7 to 8 years.

He is certainly motivated now to do this after seeing the enormous profits the movie is raking for the producers. 
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: Toadily on Mar 24, 2006, 03:10 PM
Yeah I can see frustration at seeing the profits, but what can they do?  They would have taken the bath if it failed...not him.
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 03:21 PM
Yeah I can see frustration at seeing the profits, but what can they do?  They would have taken the bath if it failed...not him.

I wish they settle out of court.  But, perversely, it keeps BBM in the news... 
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: aimi15 on Mar 24, 2006, 03:26 PM
I was impressed by Randy Quaid in BBM having only ever seen him perform comic roles - Independence Day, Kingpin, etc. I really felt he became Aguirre in the role, i didn't like him, didn't trust him, he was narrow minded and rude, it was a rounded dignified performance.

I cannot understand why someone that has nailed a part in that way and won the respect of people because of it, has kicked himself in the ar** like he has done. Now I can only think of him as a greedy, money grubbing little man.

Such a shame for BBM. I hope it doesn't lose any of its integrity because of this, to me it won't, but can't say I'm best pleased with ol' Randy. >:(

Thanks J x

Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: Toadily on Mar 24, 2006, 03:28 PM
It's interesting to hear Ang said that to him, I wonder what Jake and Heath were told?  Probably the same thing but both realize
how much this has done for their careers so they will sit tight, Randy Quaid may be feeling he literally needs the money.
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 03:37 PM
It's interesting to hear Ang said that to him, I wonder what Jake and Heath were told?  Probably the same thing but both realize
how much this has done for their careers so they will sit tight, Randy Quaid may be feeling he literally needs the money.

I would expect Ledger and Gyllenhaal to sit tight.  For the record, I will be very disillusioned in Jake if he does something like this.  He had stated in many interviews (The BBC Donnie Darko one, for example) that the box office was never a prime motivator for his selection of roles.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: *Froggy* on Mar 24, 2006, 03:37 PM
...how many minutes does he have in the movie...5 ??? and he is suing them? That's a joke!
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: Toadily on Mar 24, 2006, 03:49 PM
It's interesting to hear Ang said that to him, I wonder what Jake and Heath were told?  Probably the same thing but both realize
how much this has done for their careers so they will sit tight, Randy Quaid may be feeling he literally needs the money.

I would expect Ledger and Gyllenhaal to sit tight.  For the record, I will be very disillusioned in Jake if he does something like this.  He had stated in many interviews (The BBC Donnie Darko one, for example) that the box office was never a prime motivator for his selection of roles.

Right and also I don't think his income potential is bad at all  ;)  Randy Quaid is more limited there, but still...it seems that Hollywood is a small town and he will now be labeled difficult or ungrateful.  I can't believe his phone didn't ring more after the movie came out...
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 03:59 PM
Right and also I don't think his income potential is bad at all  ;) 

Indeed.  :)

Quote
Randy Quaid is more limited there, but still...it seems that Hollywood is a small town and he will now be labeled difficult or ungrateful.  I can't believe his phone didn't ring more after the movie came out...


God knows whatever motivated him.  His lawyers, perhaps?  Perhaps he felt that he did notnget enough recognition (his phone didn't ring enough times), so now he has to play the money game.

I don't begrudge actors their monetary deserts.  God knows so many actors (particularly the non-movie types) have to get second and third jobs for love of acting.  But Randy Quaid must really be in a rutt to do this.


Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: ethan on Mar 24, 2006, 04:03 PM
I think he sort of forgot that the Producers and the Studio did in fact take the risk.  It could have ended up a flop.  How would they know?  Hollywood didn't want to take the risk for 7 to 8 years.

He is certainly motivated now to do this after seeing the enormous profits the movie is raking for the producers. 

I think so too. Ang even told his younger brother in Taiwan not to get the licensing right for Taiwan market because he didn't think the movie was going to be making a lot of profits.

It is unfortunate. He is Joe Aquire after all. Sorry - Randy if you can fixed it, you gotta stand it.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Lost_Girl on Mar 24, 2006, 04:05 PM
Humm... Gosh.. !! I don't like Aguire.. But this one.. That's huge 10 M $ !!  :o


http://www.tmz.com/

Randy Quaid Sues Over 'Brokeback'
March 23, 2006 8:15PM ET

Randy Quaid has filed a lawsuit claiming he was done in by producers of 'Brokeback Mountain.'

TMZ obtained a copy of the lawsuit, filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, claiming producers falsely represented the movie to him as "a low-budget, art house film, with no prospect of making any money." Quaid claims the representations were a ruse from the beginning. 'Brokeback' has grossed around $160 million worldwide.

Quaid's suit claims that in 2004, he met with director Ang Lee, who offered him the role of Joe Aguirre. The suit alleges that Lee told Quaid: "We can't pay anything, we have very little money, everyone is making a sacrifice to make this film."

The suit does not specifically state how much Quaid made, but it does claim that the defendants "were engaged in a 'movie laundering' scheme designed to obtain the services of talent such as Randy Quaid on economically unfavorable art film terms..."

The suit asks for $10 million in damages as well as punitive damages. It also seeks "restitution for all ill-gotten gains."

Click here to view the papers : http://cdn.digitalcity.com/tmz_documents/randy_quaid.pdf (http://cdn.digitalcity.com/tmz_documents/randy_quaid.pdf)
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 04:17 PM
Yes, 10M is over 2/3 the production cost of the film.  It is certainly not fair.
Title: Re: News Coverage March 20 - 26
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 04:18 PM
I think so too. Ang even told his younger brother in Taiwan not to get the licensing right for Taiwan market because he didn't think the movie was going to be making a lot of profits.

And to imply duplicity on the part of Ang Lee is rather in bad taste, if I amy say so.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ethan on Mar 24, 2006, 04:22 PM
Perhaps Randy is using BBM to get his fame regardless of the outcome of the lawsuit.

It is indeed a bad taste. We can really scratch Randy Quaid from BBM then and oh his brother who made some lame joke at SAG.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 04:26 PM
Perhaps Randy is using BBM to get his fame regardless of the outcome of the lawsuit.

It is indeed a bad taste. We can really scratch Randy Quaid from BBM then and oh his brother who made some lame joke at SAG.

Wel, you know, I will grant that he at least accepted the part and starred in the movie.  I think his acting was quite good -- more than good, perhaps. 

I am disappointed with his current actions, but I am thankful that BBM did get an excellent cast all the way -- no exceptions.  I do not wish him the best in this lawsuit, but I cannot complain about his role in the film itself.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: *Froggy* on Mar 24, 2006, 04:28 PM
It is indeed a bad taste. We can really scratch Randy Quaid from BBM then and oh his brother who made some lame joke at SAG.

yep
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ethan on Mar 24, 2006, 04:32 PM
Wel, you know, I will grant that he at least accepted the part and starred in the movie.  I think his acting was quite good -- more than good, perhaps. 

I am disappointed with his current actions, but I am thankful that BBM did get an excellent cast all the way -- no exceptions.  I do not wish him the best in this lawsuit, but I cannot complain about his role in the film itself.

Agreed. It is Randy Quaid we are talking about.

Is he now accusing Focus and Ang Lee for "stemming the rose"? On the other hand, I do hope the cast and crew get their fair share though - but not lawsuits.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: tpe on Mar 24, 2006, 04:37 PM
Wel, you know, I will grant that he at least accepted the part and starred in the movie.  I think his acting was quite good -- more than good, perhaps. 

I am disappointed with his current actions, but I am thankful that BBM did get an excellent cast all the way -- no exceptions.  I do not wish him the best in this lawsuit, but I cannot complain about his role in the film itself.

Agreed. It is Randy Quaid we are talking about.

Is he now accusing Focus and Ang Lee for "stemming the rose"? On the other hand, I do hope the cast and crew get their fair share though - but not lawsuits.

Yes, as Toadily had said, Ledger and Gyllenhaal would probably have more sense than to quibble about box office profits now.  They got something infinitely more valuable.    If I am not reading too much here,  I would say that wiith BBM, they have a shot at cinematic immortality.

 
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: rod1960 on Mar 24, 2006, 06:18 PM
He wants his cut of the profits when it goes to DVD! I'm actually surprised he took the part, going to Canada for a such a small part.  Anyone could have played that part and it wouldn't have mattered.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on Mar 24, 2006, 06:20 PM
Yes, as Toadily had said, Ledger and Gyllenhaal would probably have more sense than to quibble about box office profits now.  They got something infinitely more valuable.    If I am not reading too much here,  I would say that wiith BBM, they have a shot at cinematic immortality.

You're not reading too much at all.  It's been said numerous times...BBM is a landmark film.  All the primary actors in this film earned a piece of cinematic immortality for their participation.  Randy Quaid stands to loose quite a bit more than money if he pursues this suit.  Assuming there is some merit to his case, winning will be difficult.  Regardless of what he could have been paid, the budget was under 15 million.  It's doubtful anyone's paycheck came close to what would have been paid under a standard film budget.

Randy has earned a number of new fans as a result of his BBM performance.  He shouldn't risk the possible loss of respect.  If money is his primary motivation then he should take this as a lesson learned...next time he signs up for a low budget film, include a profit percentage clause in the contract!
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: LuvJackNasty on Mar 24, 2006, 06:38 PM
  Anyone could have played that part and it wouldn't have mattered.

That's what I said today. One of my friends at work told me it was Jake that was suing and I had a hard time believing that and I'm so glad it's not him. From what I remember and I could be wrong the movie was made to be shown in a few select areas and then go to dvd. The success it had was not anticipated IMO. I think it's f'd up that he's suing and he was only in the movie for about 10 minutes. I'm not really happy over this and have lost some respect for him.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Italian_Dude on Mar 24, 2006, 07:03 PM
yeah okay, as if..

I could have did his part. He had like 5 lines the entire movie... give me a break! how sad.. 
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: arizonamman on Mar 24, 2006, 07:06 PM
 >:(
I hope they tell him to go "stem his own rose."
;D
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Italian_Dude on Mar 24, 2006, 07:09 PM
>:(
I hope they tell him to go "stem his own rose."
;D

hahahahahaa!! YES!  ;D
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: *Froggy* on Mar 24, 2006, 07:11 PM
>:(
I hope they tell him to go "stem his own rose."
;D

hahahahahaa!! YES!  ;D

LOL!...I had another thought...but cant post it here!
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: LuvJackNasty on Mar 24, 2006, 08:52 PM
>:(
I hope they tell him to go "stem his own rose."
;D

LMAO!  ;D
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on Mar 24, 2006, 09:06 PM
>:(
I hope they tell him to go "stem his own rose."
;D

HA! HAAAAA!!! LUV IT!!
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ennisandjack on Mar 25, 2006, 01:03 AM
If anyone deserved a 'bonus' it would have to be Jake and Heath who also worked for very little. Clearly Ang and company had no idea it would break out the way it did. People were wondering if it would even break even when it first came out. I actually think it would be fair to give some kind of bonus to Jake and Heath. However, Randy was hardly in the film and this lawsuit is tacky to say the least. Very dissapointing.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ethan on Mar 25, 2006, 01:06 AM
If anyone deserved a 'bonus' it would have to be Jake and Heath who also worked for very little. Clearly Ang and company had no idea it would break out the way it did. People were wondering if it would even break even when it first came out. I actually think it would be fair to give some kind of bonus to Jake and Heath. However, Randy was hardly in the film and this lawsuit is tacky to say the least. Very dissapointing.

Hello ennisandjack, well said. It is indeed disappointing. Clearly, money is his motivation. He is not a starving actor, is he?
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: bubbaluna on Mar 25, 2006, 03:29 AM
Agreed......although he certainly adds to the film it's not like there aren't a dozen others who couldn't have easily filled his part....If anyone deserves a bonus it is Jake and Heath and Michelle and Anne and Roberta Maxwell
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Jennis on Mar 25, 2006, 07:41 AM
>:(
I hope they tell him to go "stem his own rose."
;D

HA! HAAAAA!!! LUV IT!!

He should go and sleep with the sheep!
Jennis.x
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: *Froggy* on Mar 25, 2006, 11:54 AM
He should go and sleep with the sheep!
Jennis.x

I know just the tent he could use...smells real nice! ;D
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: scruffy on Mar 25, 2006, 01:15 PM
If anyone deserves a bonus it is the horse that had to carry Randy Quaid and his over-sized ego around the mountain.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: *Froggy* on Mar 25, 2006, 01:17 PM
If anyone deserves a bonus it is the horse that had to carry Randy Quaid and his over-sized ego around the mountain.

LOL
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: shakestheground on Mar 25, 2006, 01:57 PM
If your 25 years old and have been in a ground breaking movie and your career is taking off, that is one thing.

If your 55 years old and had a minor part in a ground breaking movie it is going to do nothing for your career. He wants the next best thing. Money. 
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ennisandjack on Mar 26, 2006, 05:04 AM
Hello ennisandjack, well said. It is indeed disappointing. Clearly, money is his motivation. He is not a starving actor, is he?

Hi Ethan, yes he is only concerned with the cash, doesn't seem to care about the film at all. I liked him in the movie but why he thinks he deserves an amount almost equalling the entire budget of the film is beyond me.
Title: Randy Quaid files suit against producers of BBM
Post by: brokenheart5813 on Mar 26, 2006, 04:59 PM
Well this is stupid.....from Netscape News:

Actor Quaid sues 'Brokeback Mountain' producers for 'deception'



LOS ANGELES (AFP) - US actor Randy Quaid has sued the makers of "Brokeback Mountain" for 10 million dollars, claiming they hoodwinked him into accepting a low-ball salary for his role in the Oscar-winning movie.

The star of "Midnight Express" and "Independence Day" claimed in his suit filed in Los Angeles on Thursday that producers falsely told him the movie would be "a low-budget, art house film, with no prospect of making any money."

But Taiwanese director Ang Lee's gay cowboy tale, that cost around 14 million dollars to make and stars Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal, has become an Oscar-winning sensation, raking in 160 million dollars in global ticket sales.

Quaid, who played tough sheep rancher Joe Aguirre, said that by Hollywood standards, a low-budget movie budget cost beteen 500,000 dollars and seven million dollars.


But producers, including James Schamus, David Linde and Focus Features, had deliberately misled him into taking a low salary by falsely claiming that "everyone was making sacrifices" to get the controversial movie made.


"By virtue of the misrepresentations, (producers) have enriched themselves to the tune of approximately 160 million dollars in worldwide gross box office receipts on the back of actors who were convinced to cut their fees purportedly to ensure that the film reached the screen" the suit stated.


Quaid claimed that in 2004 he met Lee, who offered him a role, saying: "We can't pay anything, we have very little money, everyone is making a sacrifice to make this film," according to the suit.


Lee is not targeted by the action that seeks 10 million dollars in damages as well as punitive damages from Focus Features and other producers.


Quaid, 55, did not state how much he was paid to play Aguirre, who hires the pair of amorous cowboys, played by Ledger and Gyllenhaal, in the movie.


But he alleged that he had suffered a loss of at least 10 million dollars as a result of the producers alleged antics and that he "would never have agreed to allow (producers) to enrich themselves at his expense."


The suit also claims that producers "were engaged in a 'movie laundering' scheme designed to obtain the services of talent such as Randy Quaid on economically unfavorable art film terms."


Focus Features did not immediately return calls for comment on the legal challenge over the film that won three Oscars including best director on March 5.




Title: Re: Randy Quaid files suit against producers of BBM
Post by: aimi15 on Mar 26, 2006, 05:15 PM
My god i earn about 60p for 5 minutes work - where the justice? Randy - quit whining!!! >:(
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: bbmlover on Mar 26, 2006, 05:30 PM

.....jerk........well i was dissappointed by his behaviour.
......
"money".....i thought was not answer for everything
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: davidgray624 on Mar 27, 2006, 05:10 PM
Randy Quaid has plenty of money. More money than billions of people have. He should be honored that he was even in this movie. I really do not think Ang Lee had any wrong intentions when he told Randy that he didn't think the movie was going to make a lot of movie. Who could have predicted that it would have? I think Randy needs to be humbled that he was in this movie and just SHUT UP!  >:(
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: tpe on Mar 27, 2006, 05:15 PM
Yes, as Toadily had said, Ledger and Gyllenhaal would probably have more sense than to quibble about box office profits now.  They got something infinitely more valuable.    If I am not reading too much here,  I would say that wiith BBM, they have a shot at cinematic immortality.

You're not reading too much at all.  It's been said numerous times...BBM is a landmark film.  All the primary actors in this film earned a piece of cinematic immortality for their participation.  Randy Quaid stands to loose quite a bit more than money if he pursues this suit.  Assuming there is some merit to his case, winning will be difficult.  Regardless of what he could have been paid, the budget was under 15 million.  It's doubtful anyone's paycheck came close to what would have been paid under a standard film budget.

Randy has earned a number of new fans as a result of his BBM performance.  He shouldn't risk the possible loss of respect.  If money is his primary motivation then he should take this as a lesson learned...next time he signs up for a low budget film, include a profit percentage clause in the contract!

Thanks City Slickin' Cowboy :) 

I really feel sorry, in a way, for him.  I don't think it's going to be a win on anything for him.  I just don't understand what made him do this -- unless he is really pressed for money. 

Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on Mar 27, 2006, 06:59 PM
At some point in the future o'l Randy will have to explain himself in detail. I'm interested in what he has to say.  Right now I just feel sorry for him...and I'm a little pissed. >:(
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: cara1158 on Mar 28, 2006, 09:55 AM
In my local paper (NJ Star Ledger) last night there was a small article about this topic, Randy suing.  At the end was this blurb:  "You don't hear this kind of whining from Heath Ledger, now do you? On the other hand, Quaid didn't get to kiss Jake Gyllenhaal."

ROFLMAO!!!
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: stephan on Mar 28, 2006, 11:11 AM
In my local paper (NJ Star Ledger) last night there was a small article about this topic, Randy suing.  At the end was this blurb:  "You don't hear this kind of whining from Heath Ledger, now do you? On the other hand, Quaid didn't get to kiss Jake Gyllenhaal."

ROFLMAO!!!

Thanks, cara1158, for that quip from your newspaper ! Thanks for making me laugh, when this whole lawsuit thing is sickening. I keep telling myself it's the professional actor who's doing this, not the character i the film, but somehow that makes it worse. Professional crybaby.

Stephan
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: *Froggy* on Mar 28, 2006, 01:47 PM
In my local paper (NJ Star Ledger) last night there was a small article about this topic, Randy suing.  At the end was this blurb:  "You don't hear this kind of whining from Heath Ledger, now do you? On the other hand, Quaid didn't get to kiss Jake Gyllenhaal."

ROFLMAO!!!

HAHAHAHAHA! Great ...thankx for posting cara1158
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on Mar 28, 2006, 02:58 PM
In my local paper (NJ Star Ledger) last night there was a small article about this topic, Randy suing.  At the end was this blurb:  "You don't hear this kind of whining from Heath Ledger, now do you? On the other hand, Quaid didn't get to kiss Jake Gyllenhaal."

ROFLMAO!!!

LMMCAO!!! (Laughing My Metro Cowboy A** Off!)
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: davidgray624 on Mar 28, 2006, 03:38 PM
In my local paper (NJ Star Ledger) last night there was a small article about this topic, Randy suing.  At the end was this blurb:  "You don't hear this kind of whining from Heath Ledger, now do you? On the other hand, Quaid didn't get to kiss Jake Gyllenhaal."

ROFLMAO!!!

Kudos to the writer of that article. HAHAHAHA. He hit the nail on the head!
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: LuvJackNasty on Mar 28, 2006, 08:50 PM
In my local paper (NJ Star Ledger) last night there was a small article about this topic, Randy suing.  At the end was this blurb:  "You don't hear this kind of whining from Heath Ledger, now do you? On the other hand, Quaid didn't get to kiss Jake Gyllenhaal."

ROFLMAO!!!

Thanks for posting that Cara- I didn't read yesterday's Ledger. I just dug it out and found the article. That's so true-LMAO!
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ragtimecowboy on Mar 28, 2006, 09:42 PM
Greed has reared it's ugly face at last. He wouldn't have let out a peep if it was flop. He actually plays a couple of bit parts with a few lines and shots in the movie. All the attention the movie has gotten could lead to more roles for him. Though it may not now, because of his own greediness. Other producers may pass him over becuse of this suit.He should have CHA at the outset. No one forced him to sign on the dotted line for the for the pay he was to receive. He doesn't deserve a nickel more.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: honestjoe1959 on Mar 28, 2006, 11:35 PM
it would be great if court tells randy quaid, in joe aguerre's own words, YOU'RE WASTING YOUR TIME HERE!
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: cauliflower on Mar 30, 2006, 06:21 AM
An interesting point of view this morning in The New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/movies/29quaid.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1143717278-zMALLx6VV+SwSMyr496yQg

The actors were paid a total of 520K dollars? Who is screwing who?
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: kari100 on Mar 30, 2006, 07:18 AM
An interesting point of view this morning in The New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/movies/29quaid.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1143717278-zMALLx6VV+SwSMyr496yQg

The actors were paid a total of 520K dollars? Who is screwing who?

I have to register to read the article. Can you post the whole thing?
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ethan on Mar 30, 2006, 07:42 AM
LOS ANGELES, March 28 — Can Hollywood make quality movies for both love and money?
Skip to next paragraph
Kim D. Johnson/Associated Press


Randy Quaid, who played a small part in "Brokeback Mountain."

Not according to a lawsuit filed last week by the actor Randy Quaid over payments for "Brokeback Mountain," in which he played a small supporting role.

The dispute, one of dozens that annually erupt over pay and practices in the film industry, has been dismissed by some film veterans as a case of sour grapes over a deal that could have been better negotiated for Mr. Quaid.

But others say it points to an uncomfortable contradiction in the specialty divisions owned by the major studios, including Focus Features, Fox Searchlight, Warner Independent, Miramax and others. That is, movies are budgeted as though they were in the independent world, often squeezing every nickel out of actors, directors and production staff, who cut their fees to near nothing for the privilege of making a picture they are passionate about.

When it comes to releasing the film, however, the "arthouse" divisions can take advantage of the deep pockets of their studio parents, frequently spending tens of millions of dollars to promote a movie to glory or box office success in the award season.

"There is a trap in there somewhere, with the specialty divisions working in bigger and bigger contexts, trying to get bigger numbers," said Ira Deutchman, president of Emerging Pictures, and a longtime player in the independent world.

In his lawsuit, Mr. Quaid claims he was tricked into accepting a tiny (unspecified) fee for the part of Joe Aguirre, the rancher who hires the shepherds played by Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal, because the director, Ang Lee, told him the movie was being made on a shoestring budget by Focus, the arthouse division of Universal Studios. And while the production budget was very low, $14 million according to documents filed in Canada where the movie was shot, the lawsuit claims that Focus knew all along that it would throw millions — $30 million, according to the complaint — into marketing the film.

The complaint says that the defendants, in this case Focus and its recent co-presidents David Linde and James Schamus, "have enriched themselves to the tune of approximately $160 million in worldwide gross box office receipts on the back of actors who were convinced to cut their fees purportedly to ensure that the film reached the screen." Far from being a labor of love, it says, the picture was a "movie laundering" scheme that "in reality, had studio backing and would be exploited using traditional studio marketing and distribution techniques."

A Focus representative declined to comment on the lawsuit, citing a policy against discussing pending litigation.

To be sure, Mr. Quaid's role in the Oscar-winning film was tiny, and few would attribute the success of "Brokeback" to the handful of minutes he spends on screen.

But the disparity between actors' fees and the film's promotional budget points toward what may be an endemic problem for the specialty divisions: even actors whose contracts provide for profit participation in successful films may find there is no profit left in which to participate, while the studios still collect rich distribution fees.

"It's a complicated question, and it is both the genius and the nefarious nature of these mini-majors," said Linda Lichter, a lawyer who sells films in the independent world. "The purpose of those mini-majors is to try to make movies that the major studios can't afford to make, for less money. But they don't make those movies unless they get big players who are willing to cut their price." On the other hand, "Randy Quaid had a tiny part," she said, adding, "There's an aspect here of biting the hand that feeds him."

Another veteran entertainment lawyer, Susan Bodine, said it was typical for actors who took low fees for arthouse movies to be given points in the net profits of a film. But, she pointed out, "as a general matter, net profit participants on studio-released films, even low-budget films, can be nothing, even when the film does really well." She said it was too early to know if that would be the case with "Brokeback Mountain." But in the Oscar season, "the better the film does, the more they spend on it, the less likely there'll ever be any net profit." (Ms. Bodine represents Mr. Schamus, in private matters, but did not have any dealings on "Brokeback Mountain.")

That would seem to be the case with some of the films that made it to the best picture category this year at the Oscars. "Good Night, and Good Luck," from Warner Independent, cost a mere $8 million to produce, with the actors earning the lowest permissible union fee, known as scale, an executive involved in the film said. Warner Brothers spent about $25 million to promote the film for the Oscars and in its general release, so while the movie took in $51 million around the world, there will be no profit to share in, the executive said. (Distributors share box office revenue with theater owners.)

Similarly, "Crash," which cost $6.5 million to produce, and was released by Lionsgate, has taken in $90.8 million around the world. So far, the movie's main participants, who deferred their fees to get the movie made, have seen only minimal payments, said an executive involved in its release. The lack of payment to one producer has kicked up a lawsuit against Bob Yari, who put together the film's financing.

Some in Hollywood defended Focus against Mr. Quaid's claims, though they declined to speak on the record so as not to affect their own business relationships. An executive from another arthouse studio, for instance, said that these companies could not function without actors working for low fees, since the vast majority of their films were not successful commercially or otherwise. The executive said that the most prominent actors were granted bonus fees for successful films, or a cut of the adjusted gross box-office receipts.

Several pointed out that Focus could not have known that its gay-themed love story would become the success that it eventually did, and did not set out to deceive Mr. Quaid. A lawyer for Mr. Quaid, who is seeking $10 million in damages, would not comment on his deal, although the complaint notes that the actors were paid a total of $521,000 for their work on the film.

But Mr. Deutchman, the Emerging Pictures president, said the lawsuit illuminated a problem that could lead to actors and other talent becoming more reluctant to sign on to arthouse movies made at the studios. "If, in fact, the smaller movies don't pay off for talent even when they hit, the studio arthouse divisions will stop being able to make the movies," he said. "They'll fall into the same trap as the parent companies: if no one believes there's a back end, then actors will want higher and higher salaries to be in those movies."
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: stephan on Mar 30, 2006, 08:03 AM
Ah, even when there's "only a few million dollars" at stake, things get so complicated you need a devious mind to figure it out. Surprise, surprise.

Thanks, Ethan, for the article you posted. Things are in perspective now. Always the same old story, how can the fewest number pocket the biggest sum. Mr Quaid isn't any greedier than the next person in the film industry ; he just happened to have 2 minutes in one of the greatest films in history. Of course he's going to try to get more of the profit. Probably needs it to pay for a new mansion.

Sorry, I cannot see this incident with any humour.  :(
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ethan on Mar 30, 2006, 08:13 AM
You are welcome, Stephan. I share the same sentiment with you. It is very unfortunate. It is good that I never like Joe Aquirre in the movie so it makes easier to watch the DVD.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: LuvJackNasty on Mar 30, 2006, 09:02 PM
Thanks for the article. I'm still annoyed by this. IMO there were many different reasons people went to see this movie and Randy Quaid wasn't one of them.

Stephan- my friend said something similar- that he needed to buy a new summer home and that's why he's complaining.  :)
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: bubbaluna on Mar 31, 2006, 07:36 AM
I probably missed this but does anyone have any idea what Jake and Heath were paid for BBM..when I think of the millions of dollars that Tom Cruise, Julia Roberts and others get for some of their "trash" and I imagine that our boys probably got nothing even close to that it makes me crazy...they deserve 20M each for their performances.......I hope that at least in their future roles they are paid competetively..I know it's not all about money......
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Jennis on Mar 31, 2006, 07:57 AM
I probably missed this but does anyone have any idea what Jake and Heath were paid for BBM..when I think of the millions of dollars that Tom Cruise, Julia Roberts and others get for some of their "trash" and I imagine that our boys probably got nothing even close to that it makes me crazy...they deserve 20M each for their performances.......I hope that at least in their future roles they are paid competetively..I know it's not all about money......
I wouldn't think they were paid much at all Bubbaluna,not by todays standards.If the figure of $521,000 was the pay for the whole cast then it was minimal.No doubt they have recouped revenue from promotion etc,but the work they did creating such a mind blowing film will be remembered for all time as a work of love

Jennis.x
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: bram on Mar 31, 2006, 08:07 AM
Maybe he's just mad because he didn't get paid more for promotion. I mean, Heath, Jake, Michelle, and Anne all got paid to be on talk shows and stuff. Then again, he had a very small part. You don't see the other people that had small parts complaining.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Jennis on Mar 31, 2006, 09:52 AM
Maybe he's just mad because he didn't get paid more for promotion. I mean, Heath, Jake, Michelle, and Anne all got paid to be on talk shows and stuff. Then again, he had a very small part. You don't see the other people that had small parts complaining.
Did he actually do any promoting? Not that he needed too,just wondered.
J.x
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: bram on Mar 31, 2006, 09:57 AM
Maybe he's just mad because he didn't get paid more for promotion. I mean, Heath, Jake, Michelle, and Anne all got paid to be on talk shows and stuff. Then again, he had a very small part. You don't see the other people that had small parts complaining.
Did he actually do any promoting? Not that he needed too,just wondered.
J.x

I didn't see him do any promoting.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Patriot1 on Mar 31, 2006, 08:36 PM

Brokeback Mountain is a movie with a great story. The actors and their abilities brought the characters to life for us to the point where many of us identify with one or more of those characters. Brokeback Mountain for one or more reasons has come alive for us and we have fallen in love with it.

When a person loves someone or something it is only natural to want to defend that someone or something when we think it is being attacked or somehow cheapened. That, after all, is a part of loving. But love can make us blind to other perspectives.

Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger both said they wanted to participate in this movie because they fell in love with the characters and because it was a story that had never been told and needed telling.

Annie Proulx said that when she was writing the story the characters came alive to her as no other characters she had written about ever did.  She said she especially loved Ennis.

We, the viewers, because of all those things and more, have fallen in love with Brokeback Mountain. But, because of that love, we forget that not everyone is in love with it.  For some, Brokeback Mountain was simply a job. A means to make a living by using their talents.

Randy Quade is one of those people.  He was approached by director and studio to see if he wanted a job.  He claims he was told it would be a low budget “arts” film with a limited audience (mostly gay) and would play in “arts” movie houses where the ticket prices range from one dollar to five dollars a ticket.  At those prices there would be little profit if any from a limited audience. It was, in fact, a low budget film at a reported fourteen million dollars.

With the filming being completed and the film now in post production the word was spreading rapidly about this “gay cowboy” movie called Brokeback Mountain. The gay community was excited about it and the Christian right was sure the devil had a hand in its production. Much was written about it from both sides and everywhere in between. 

With the movie finished, it went to the film festivals where it was generally well received as an excellently made film.  There were glowing reviews and reviews of damnation. There was a great deal of “buzz” about Brokeback Mountain in movie circles.  So much so that first-run movie houses started to show an interest.

So much interest was shown that the studio decided they may not have just an “arts” film here and decided to distribute it to a very limited number of first-run theaters where the ticket prices ranged from six dollars to twelve dollars a ticket.  If the movie went well in these theaters there was great potential for this movie making a good profit.

Well, Brokeback Mountain did do well in these theaters so the studio decided to slowly increase the number of theaters that would show the movie. First-run movie houses were calling and asking for the movie; something never expected. The studio also decided to promote the movie more than they had originally planned.  While Brokeback Mountain was by no means a “blockbuster”, it did very well for a movie with it’s subject matter and with a simulated gay sex scene in it.

But where does that leave us?  The movie was not expected to be this famous or popular and the actors already agreed to take less than their usual fees for an “arts” film which didn’t end up being an “arts” film at all and was never promoted as an “arts” film.

One man, a professional in his trade, asked the question, why should the studio and producers make huge profits from this film when he was asked to reduce his fees “because the movie probably wouldn’t make any money.”  No matter how you feel about the movie this is a good question. Don’t ALL the actors deserve their honest pay from a movie that has made so much? Do the producers and studio really have to make big bucks off of the labor of notable and good actors who were not paid what they were really worth?

Randy is suing for ten million dollars and that seems to have us outraged.  But, we should remember that most times people sue for a LOT more than they really want knowing there will probably be a settlement to the fairer amount. Randy just wants what his skills have gotten him in the past. The money is there to pay him that and ALL the actors what they are worth. Why should the producers and studio keep it?

Put yourself into Randy’s shoes.  Someone comes to you and says they need someone with your skills but they can’t pay much because the project probably won’t make any money.  You like the project and agree to take fifty dollars a day when you are use to making three hundred dollars a day.  When it is all finished you find out the company that hired you made an enormous profit.  Wouldn’t you be a little upset? Be honest with yourself at least.

Of course, reality doesn’t make those of us who love Brokeback Mountain feel much better as we watch our love being attack and smeared. We feel the need to defend it and attack those who are doing the attacking and smearing of our beloved Brokeback Mountain and through it, our two young lovers who we love so, so, much.

But Randy isn’t a bad guy.  He is just a nice guy, and a good enough actor that Ang Lee wanted him, who agreed to take less than his normal fee for doing a job in a project that was suppose to be a financial flop, because it was supposed to be promoted as an “arts” film but instead was promoted as a major motion picture.

In my view, now that the producers changed the “type” of film from “arts” to major, and since the movie has made major money, the producers should stop being so greedy and pay ALL the actors what they are worth and then, together, celebrate the making of a film that has touched the hearts and lives of so many people around the world.

Let’s not even discuss the possibility of the studio and producers planning to promote the film as a major motion picture from the very beginning instead of an “Arts” film.


Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: JerBear418720 on Mar 31, 2006, 08:59 PM
Perhaps Randy is using BBM to get his fame regardless of the outcome of the lawsuit.

It is indeed a bad taste. We can really scratch Randy Quaid from BBM then and oh his brother who made some lame joke at SAG.

Apparently tackiness runs in the family - maybe Randy Quaid as Aguirre wasn't such a stretch.

And, as Froggy pointed out, he was on camera for like 5 minutes.

This is more pathetic than anything else, IMHO.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: bram on Mar 31, 2006, 09:06 PM
Okay, my main problem with it was that he asking for so much money. I mean, that seemed like more than anyone would pay Randy Quaid for such a small role. You make a lot of sense with the suing for way more than you expect to get thing, though. I never even thought about that.

I doubt that the producers were planning from the start to market it as a major motion picture. When I first heard about and saw it advertised, I was under the impression that it was an "Arts" film. The only place I had seen it advertised was the "Arts" theater downtown, and it just didn't seem like a movie that would be playing at AMC. I was shocked to see it playing there. It looked like most of the movies in my collection at home, but like none of the movies that I had seen in a regular theater.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: JerBear418720 on Mar 31, 2006, 09:08 PM
Maybe he's just mad because he didn't get paid more for promotion. I mean, Heath, Jake, Michelle, and Anne all got paid to be on talk shows and stuff. Then again, he had a very small part. You don't see the other people that had small parts complaining.

Good point, bram.  I don't see Roberta Maxwell or Peter McRobbie filing suits.  Besides, many acting contracts are written with % of profits clauses - Quaid could have done that; he's been around for years and knows the game well.  Stop your whining, Randy.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on Mar 31, 2006, 09:20 PM
Good point, bram.  I don't see Roberta Maxwell or Peter McRobbie filing suits.  Besides, many acting contracts are written with % of profits clauses - Quaid could have done that; he's been around for years and knows the game well.  Stop your whining, Randy.

Seems as though we think alike regarding this subject.  I couldn't agree more.  ;)
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: arizonamman on Mar 31, 2006, 09:52 PM
I have always known I do not fit in as a member of the straight community. But being a member of this forum has also shown me that I do not fit in as a member of the gay community. My thoughts, perceptions, ideas and the way I see things are so different from those of others here.

I am not sure what the above statement has to do with this topic, perhaps you just felt you needed to say it. However, for the rest of your comments and for Mr. Quaid, I have only 1 question:

Was a contract signed?

If so, all parties must abide by the agreed upon terms. I doubt anyone will ever see the contract except the lawyers of all concerned parties.

I would like to hear from someone who is familiar with the film industry regarding the options given actors in a film. Are they not given the option of either a flat salary or taking a % of profits? Further, are they not given an option for future earnings such as DVD sales?

I think Randy pretty much shot himself in the foot for any chance of sharing any future profits. But again, perhaps he was ill advised or simply had a low expectation of the film himself that influenced the bottom line option he agreed upon for both the film and DVD sales.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ennisandjack on May 03, 2006, 04:06 PM
QUAID BROKEBACK LAWSUIT TAKES CURIOUS TURN   
 
http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/quaid%20brokeback%20lawsuit%20takes%20curious%20turn_03_05_2006
 
LATEST: Actor RANDY QUAID has dropped his $10 million (GBP5.8 million) lawsuit against the producers of BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, insisting they have reached an agreement to pay him a bonus. The star filed the suit in Los Angeles Superior Court in March (06), claiming he was underpaid for his supporting role in the film as rancher JOE AGUIRRE. Quaid alleged Focus Features duped him into deferring his normal payment for the film by touting the production as an independent art-house film that couldn't afford to pay actors their normal rate. However, a Focus Features spokesperson is adamant no settlement has been agreed with the actor. According to Quaid's representatives, the agreement was unofficial and the actor has requested the bonus be split among the cast members. The Focus Features spokesperson says, "The circumstances of him dropping the suit are as mysterious as the circumstances under which he filed his claim. "Focus Features never negotiated, offered or agreed to any settlement agreement with Mr Quaid or his attorneys, but we're happy to put this behind us, and do wish Mr Quaid the best." The Oscar-nominated film, starring HEATH LEDGER and JAKE GYLLENHAAL, has grossed nearly $160 million (GBP91 million) worldwide.
03/05/2006 21:13 
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ennisandjack on May 03, 2006, 04:08 PM
Deal or no deal?

Brokeback Mountain star drops suit, claims settlement reached     

http://www.canada.com/topics/entertainment/story.html?id=bed42e6b-19fd-48d2-a68e-89dce2e634c2&k=86579

Randy Quaid has dropped his lawsuit against the studio that released Brokeback Mountain, claiming he reached an out-of-court settlement.

Quaid, who filed a $10 million (all figures U.S.) against Focus Features in March seeking a cut of the movie’s box office profits, insisted the studio agreed to pay him a bonus. A rep for the actor said Tuesday it was an informal agreement between lawyers for both sides.

But Focus Features claims in a statement it never “negotiated, offered or agreed to any settlement agreement.”

Brokeback Mountain, starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger as sheep herders who fall in love after being hired by Quaid’s character, has grossed about $160 million worldwide.

"The circumstances of him dropping the suit are as mysterious as the circumstances under which he filed his claim,” read the statement from Focus Features. “But… we are happy to put this behind us, and do wish Mr. Quaid all the best."

Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: tpe on May 03, 2006, 05:31 PM
This is the best resolution for this.  He redeems himself a bit by choosing to settle quietly.  He is not stupid to not know how he has aleinated BBM lovers by his actions.

Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: LuvJackNasty on May 03, 2006, 09:57 PM
So true TPE. I'm still mad at him though.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: ethan on May 04, 2006, 02:04 AM
ennisandjack, thanks for posting the update.

I agree with tpe - it is really a shame for what RQ (I don't even want to spell his name) did.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: City Slickin' Cowboy on May 05, 2006, 06:36 AM
I'm just glad to see a "settlement" of some sort has been reached.  Maybe someone in Quaid's camp finally got him to realize how potentially harmful this suit could have been to his career.
Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: Patriot1 on May 05, 2006, 06:53 AM


So quick to vilify but nobody has said one word about what Randy requested be done with the settlement. 

Split it with all the actors.





Title: Re: Randy Quaid suing Focus Features for 10 M!
Post by: tpe on May 05, 2006, 07:04 AM


So quick to vilify but nobody has said one word about what Randy requested be done with the settlement. 

Split it with all the actors.

Indeed Patriot1.  Alas, I interpret this as face-saving.  Had this been the original intention, it would have been stipulated in the original suit.  He was mercifully advised to make the most of a bad situation.  And as the articles said, Focus is mystified by the turn of events.  The other actors did not join him in the suit.  His gesture, though thoughtful and considerate, was more for himself and his image, rather than for the other actors.

You can play magnanimous in the face of almost universal condemnation.