You make my point for me. BBM is none of these things save the landscape: Contemporary Westerns, as the name implies, are films that have contemporary American settings but nevertheless utilize Old West themes and motifs (a rebellious antihero, open plains and landscapes, climactic gunfights, etc.). For the most part, they still take place in the American West and reveal the progression of the Old West mentality into the late twentieth century. There is absolutely NO "Old West Mentality", no rebellioius antihero, no climatic gunfights, no progression of the Old West mentality into the late 20th century in BBM.
I think you doth protest too much. IMDB classifies it as a "Drama/Romance" and rightfully so as that it exactly what it is. Neither the writer nor the director of BBM consider it a "Western", nor even a "Contemporary Western" and no one has posted otherwise. You can call BBM a Western if you like, and I can call it a Comedy if I like, but neither would be accurate.
dresden, I do not get your point here. What would you call Ennis? Is he not in the classic mould of the striong silent anti-hero glorified in the great Westerns? As far as your comment regarding
There is absolutely NO "Old West Mentality", it is completely false. If you read the screenplay of BBM, you will see that McMurty directly references several great Westerns in a number of BBM scenes. One of them, being
'Giant', stars James Dean, who plays the role of a strong silent anti-hero. This should not surprise you, because LARRY MCMURTY HIMSELF HAS SAID IN SEVERAL OCCASIONS THAT HE DRAWS A PARALLEL WITH ENNIS AND THE ROLE PLAYED BY JAMES DEAN.
Second, would you call references and scenes to the RODEO as NOT illustrating the old West Mentality? To me, this is quite obvious. It deserves no further elaboration.
An old West mentality, landscape, an anti-hero, gunfights, etc. are examples of charactersitics of the contemporary Western. A contemporary Western does not have to have ALL THESE. In this light,
'Dead Man', has an anti-hero and gunfights, but the mentality and landscape are all set in the forests and coasts of the Pacific Northwest, there are no cowboys, and the plot is ALIEN to the natures of both classic and contemporary Westerns. By your definition (and mine, I would say), this will NOT be classed as a Western, AND YET, IMDB CLASSIFIES IT AS SUCH!!!! Go figure.

Incidentally,
'Giant', which is universally considered a Western, IS NOT CLASSIFIED AS SUCH IN IMDB. Like BBM, it is classified as DRAMA! (Certainly not mutually exclusive with respect to a Western!)
There you go again. Are there "Cowboys" in BBM or not? You contradict youself, by your last sentence above: "It is incidental that cowboys WERE A PART of this story. "Cowboys" were NOT a part of this (BBM) story. The writer said so quite vehemently in the Jackson Hole WY interview posted previously. Had Annie P. put the setting of BBM in the late 19th Century, as I truly wish she had, then BBM could rightfully claim the genre of "Western". As it is, it is not, can not, and never will be.
Again, I do not get you here. Something can be a part of a whole without defining the whole, am I correct? Do you not agree that there are a LOT of Westerns with cowboys, BUT NOT ALL WESTERNS HAVE COWBOYS? It is strange that you find this so contradictory!
"Cowboys" in BBM or not? Don't you think some of the rodeo participants in the Texas scenes ARE cowboys? You cannot say that ALL of them were sheepherders, especially in that part of Texas.
When Annie P. refers to "rural Western" she is talking about geography NOT genre.
Although I think her meaning and context is clear enough, I suggest that we do not interpret her words as if WE were HER.
Ang Lee Planet Out BBM interview: I resent when it's described as a "gay cowboy" story. It's easy to do that, but culturally it has a funny connotation, like "Blazing Saddles." They also call it a "gay Western," and that's not provocative or accurate: the Western is a movie genre -- it's not really what I deal with. But it is a gay love story.
As I had said earlier,
dresden, I am quite open here to different points of view. If you read my initial post, you will see that I even lean to your opinion. But what I cannot abide is any overt form of dogmatism in matters literary and artistic. I personally recognize the multiple themes in BBM as part and parcel of the overall richness. If people can classify it as a Western, so be it. To me, there is enough evidence to support such a contention, and BBM can only gain by the added level of meaning.
Such is always the case in Art. And Art is NOT Dogmatic Religion.