The subject of whether Ennis and Jack were straight, gay, or bi has been covered in a previous thread and there were many opinions. Am not
going to try to reopen a "dead thread" but wanted to bring up a new theory proposed by two psychologists in 1984 that has been shunned as
unacceptable to gays AND straights. It has possible relevance to those who supported the "straight-but love conquers all" versions.
They proposed that straight males CAN have same gender sex based on 5 categories of personality. Cat 1 cannot respond ever, and
curiously, make lousy husbands. Cat 2 males could, in a pinch (say, prison or a desert island) but are known for being the party whips, always
criticizing any goofing off as gay. Cat 3 males never think of themselves as interested but, in fact, can experiment under the right conditions
(drunk with a buddy). Cat 4 males are sensual, make excellent husbands, but would easily try the same gender because sensuality governs
them. Cat 5 males are almost sociopathic and will break any rule for their own pleasure. In this theory, there are no bisexuals, and, alas, they
did not explore gays, only straights. The theory is supported by pupil dilation tests which show that most straight males pupils dilate at the
sight of naked men, which means--some interest.
The many opinions that were expressed in the "dead thread" were thoughtful, sometimes passionate, and sometimes influenced by what they
WANTED (as some admitted) the meaning of BBM to be-gay liberation or love conquers all. But there IS a new working theory and it would
support Ennis being straight (as he showed no generic interest in other males), and Jack being---Category 4.
Maybe the best answer I read was that Ennis was Jacksexual. There was so much on both sides. am not reviving the issue so much as pointing
out that there is a new theory, covering the territory of unexpected behavior in straight males and it is being fought because it doesn't fit what
anybody wants to believe. It doesn't settle the issue of Jack and Ennis and the final resolution of most was to focus back on an astounding love
story. But wanted to let the "love conquers all" people know that there is at least some support for the possibility of a straight male going
bonkers and yet remaining generically straight. Phew! Maybe should have left this one alone. All I really hope for is HUMAN liberation and so
maybe we'll get there someday not by re-arranging the boxes in our minds but by squashing them. It'll take a few centuries. Tony.