Sorry if I keep writing and commenting this whole “Ennis bottom” thing. I didn’t want. I thought that we are not going to talk more about this OT, but I see that brokies keep talking about it, even the brokies who said that we had to put this one to rest. So well, here I am. I have some questions.
Well I believe the whole point of SNIT is to show that Ennis was indeed "bottom", otherwise they would have done the scene differently.
So did Ang Lee film such a intimate delicate scene to show that Ennis was bottom? I can’t believe that!!! In SS there is not SNIT, but we have Ennis in the motel scene admitting in some way his feelings for Jack, saying that “I shouldn’t a let you out a my sights.” In the film we have not that little moment of Ennis admitting what he felt for Jack. So Ang Lee and Diana Osama said in a interview that he filmed that SNIT and she wrote the scene to make up for the lack of that “I shouldn’t a let you out a my sights”, in some way, and show how Ennis felt. SNIT is about discovery of feelings, Ennis hungry for love and another human being. I think that when you love someone you just let go and give up, but I'm speaking about feelings and not about sex.
….he wanted Jack to show him to how to make love, sweetly, romantically, sensually. Ennis was enjoying being caressed, held, and kissed by another man, something you don't see in "raw" sex like FNIT.
Jack could show how to make love being bottom himself. Not only top men can. Ennis actually gives up,*lets go * just for loving Jack. He didn’t control his feelings, and he showed them Jack just by kissing him, being in a intimate way with him. He gave up and let go just by making love and not only for being bottom. If Ennis made love as a top he was making love too!!! So he gave up and let go too.
Because he just let go just by the fact of being with another man “in bed” doing whatever. For someone like Ennis being top or bottom is just let go. Think about Jack. You said he was top on SNIT. So, he didn’t gave up to Ennis? He didn’t let go? You said that finally Ennis being bottom was making love. So Jack was not making love? To make love is what top men do too. As I said before, Ennis being top it’s making love too!! You say that Ennis was enjoying being caressed; of course like every person who makes love; and Jack was enjoying that too. You say that Ennis was bottom because Jack was holding him. Women hold men too in bed, hugging them tight. And say too that Ennis was the one being caressed and kissed, but NOT, because Ennis was kissing and caressed Jack’s chest!!! So being held and caressed doesn’t mean to be bottom. Gay men can be top and being caressed and held, not only the bottoms.
FNIT was raw, agree. Was sex, agree. But again that means that SNIT was about feelings and not about sex like FNIT so I don't think that Ang wanted to show another scene about sex because the whole point of that scene is show Ennis as a bottom like you said, then it would be about sex too. SNIT speaks about love and Ennis and Jack feelings, and Ennis
could show his feelings being top too. Or what? Top men can’t show their feelings? They don’t make love? Jack was not showing his feelings if he was top?
What I understand reading your words is that the only way for Ennis to show and feel real love is being bottom. I think Ennis could do the same being top. If you are homophobic being top is as strong “let it go” “give up” as being bottom; it’s the same because
in both ways Ennis was MAKING LOVE with a man.BTW, you associate Ennis top with raw sex (FNIT) and Ennis bottom with make love (SNIT). But I have to tell that the making love can be so rough and wild some times and still it’s making love, because you are having sex with the one you love, so, rough and wild and whatever, still is making love. In fact in the Short Story Annie Proulx said to us that their sex up in BB was
“QUICK, ROUGH, laughing and snorting, no lack of noises”; just in some way like FNIT. And they loved each other, that’s for sure.
I just can't imagine Ennis getting up from underneath Jack in that scene...
I don’t saying the contrary. Top men can make love underneath bottom men,
you know that. Straight men too. So why being underneath Jack means being bottom? That makes no sense to me. Sorry.
I think it's what he definitely wanted, it's the night that Jack showed him how to make love, and that's why the whole scene is there...to show how that night Ennis did what he really wanted to do deep down inside, he "let go".it makes perfect sense to me that he was "bottom" more times than Jack throughout the times they made love, because that's what he truly wanted.
How do you know what Ennis wanted? How can you be so sure? Just for a position on the floor? We are more complicated that that, especially Ennis….
And what about Jack?
Sure, he was still conflicted about being "queer", but simply to let a man touch him like that in the first place speaks volumes about the freedom Ennis felt that night,
Being able to let one man to touch you doesn’t mean you’re bottom. In that way, you’re bottom if someone touch you and you’re top if you touch someone? Jack is supposed to be top because he was touching Ennis, and Ennis bottom because he was touched? But like I said before, Ennis was kissing and caressing Jack chest, not only his lips but his chest. I think Jack switched the position to be able to kiss properly Ennis and not in that awkward position with his neck in a painful position. Jack could be kissed underneath Ennis too, but Ennis was so shy and scared so Jack had to switch the position to make the first move once again. But you can remember that Jack made the first move too in FNIT and he was bottom then.
Like you said SNIT speaks volumes about the freedom Ennis felt that night, but freedom of
feelings not capacity to try new postures in sex when he had made love once in his life.
That night, he wasn't compartmentalizing about what was "acceptable" and what wasn't for him out in the larger society..
So in FNIT
was he? Because having sex with a man is not “acceptable” for society neither…..
Sorry again for the long rambling. I don’t express myself well in English. I’d like to say again that I have not problem with Ennis being bottom, but with the arguments you give to me speaking about Ennis being bottom is to make love and to give up, because I understand then that one Ennis being top would not be able to make love and give up? It's unfair. I like to think, see and read that these are
just our opinions, things will never know for sure….and I like when I can feel that people say those things thinking that it is “only their opinion” and not "an universal true" (I'm not saying you said the last one!!! Jesus, no). And I say here, that really this is
my humble opinion and only my thoughts, not the true either.
I’lll just quit rambling about this thing if we all do it, I promise!!!

Love.