Author Topic: Jake's pix (Read 8131277 times)

ksxks · « **Reply #33990 on:** Jul 30, 2007, 11:47 PM »

Quote from: tpe on Jul 30, 2007, 11:13 AM

They probably wanted to show that he wasn't exactly comfortable with the times, no? The real Graysmith did also comment about the awful clothes her wore in this period. They didn't look that bad, but perhaps they were so different from the trends in the 70s...

So I'm thinking that RG did wear some awful 70's clothes, but for whatever reasons, they didn't have Jake wear them. The clothes he wears in the movie are just plain, sensible clothes, not the trendy 70's stuff. If RG said the clothes he wore were awful, I don't think he would say that about the clothes Jake wears in the movie.

Sorry everyone, being OT for this thread.

kathy

tpe · « **Reply #33991 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 08:57 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Jul 30, 2007, 10:40 PM

I think I've seen this before. What a beautiful young man taking his picture with Jake. Two beautiful men.

Okay, so here's an interesting comparison, because that other man has more "feminine" features, and seeing Jake next to him, we realize how masculine Jake's features are...yet he nonetheless has such "beauty" in the more feminine, so-called, sense of the word.

kathy

I wanted to make the same observation too, kathy. It is an intersting study of beauty: the softer and more masculine elements placed side by side.

tpe · « **Reply #33992 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 08:59 AM »

If you can see this pic, you see the same young man on the right, after jake had moved on.

tpe · « **Reply #33993 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:01 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Jul 30, 2007, 10:53 PM

I love the poetry of this -- the lines of his body. Poetry, music.

kathy

Not to mention the divine profile...

tpe · « **Reply #33994 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:03 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Jul 30, 2007, 11:15 PM

Love his shirt. Love him. And sorry -- he is center stage for me, most definitely, but I find all the details of Zodiac sets so fascinating! I love looking at all the stuff. (I always wanted to be a set designer.)

kathy

Being the set designer for Fincher's Zodiac must have been challenging!

tpe · « **Reply #33995 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:08 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Jul 30, 2007, 11:43 PM

The bottom line is he is just excellent at his craft, gifted.

kathy

And beautiful as Sin.

tpe · « **Reply #33996 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:11 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Jul 30, 2007, 11:47 PM

So I'm thinking that RG did wear some awful 70's clothes, but for whatever reasons, they didn't have Jake wear them. The clothes he wears in the movie are just plain, sensible clothes, not the trendy 70's stuff. If RG said the clothes he wore were awful, I don't think he would say that about the clothes Jake wears in the movie.

Sorry everyone, being OT for this thread.

kathy

But he did say that Jake wore exactly the kind of clothes he wore -- Fincher made sure of that. So by "awful" RG probably meant that he didn't wear trendy stuff, and therefore seemed old fashioned or behind the times in the 70s. The clothes don't look bad now, of course, given how the pendulum of fashion had swung...

tpe · « **Reply #33997 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:12 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #33998 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:14 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #33999 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:15 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34000 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:16 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34001 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:17 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34002 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:17 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34003 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:18 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34004 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:19 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34005 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:19 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34006 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:22 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34007 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:24 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34008 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:26 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34009 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:27 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34010 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:27 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34011 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:28 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34012 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:31 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34013 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:32 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34014 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:34 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34015 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:35 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34016 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:36 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34017 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:37 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34018 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:38 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #34019 on:** Jul 31, 2007, 09:39 AM »