Author Topic: The Oscars: To care or not to care  (Read 5863 times)

Offline tpe

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 96691
The Oscars: To care or not to care
« on: Feb 07, 2006, 09:05 AM »
From: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/entertainment/special_packages/academy_awards/13805830.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------

The Oscars: To care or not to care
BY BARRY KOLTNOW
The Orange County Register

Professor Barrywood hates "Good Morning America."

But the professor is an equal-opportunity hater. He also hates the "Today" show and "The Early Show."

The reason for all this ill will is a decision made years ago by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to announce the Oscar nominations live at 5:40 a.m. (Pacific Standard Time) for the benefit of the East Coast network morning shows.

The professor hates to get up in the dark and drive to Beverly Hills.

Academy officials made the decision to ruin the professor's sleep to stimulate ratings and interest in the annual awards show, although the professor would have gladly suggested that ratings and interest could be stimulated better by encouraging voting members of the academy to nominate movies that the public actually saw.

You can't care about a movie unless you've seen it, the professor's theory goes, and you are more likely to take a rooting interest in that movie's fate on Oscar night if you care about it.

But no one asked the professor's opinion, and ratings probably will go down again this year. Yes, the professor sees a correlation.

Others are not so unwilling to ask questions of the professor, and he is ready to give real answers to any fake question you can throw at him.

QUESTION: Everyone, from Las Vegas oddsmakers to Internet blowhards, is trying to predict the Oscar winners this year. Who is the most reliable Oscar prognosticator?

PROFESSOR BARRYWOOD: Jake Gyllenhaal.

Q: Could you elaborate?

PB: That will cost extra.

Q: The check is in the mail.

PB: Jake called me a few hours after he was nominated in the Best Supporting Actor category for his fine work in "Brokeback `Don't Call Me the Gay Cowboy Movie' Mountain."

Jake always checks in with the professor when he is nominated for an Oscar.

He was quite thrilled with the nomination, and regaled the professor with stories of his childhood, and what the Academy Awards meant to his family. As you might already know, the Jakester is the son of independent filmmaker Stephen Gyllenhaal and screenwriter Naomi Foner. He also is the kid brother of actress Maggie Gyllenhaal, who is a professor favorite.

Anyway, Jake said he and his family used to watch the Oscars at a family friend's home in one of the ritzier neighborhoods in Los Angeles. I'm guessing it was a ritzy neighborhood based on what Jake told me.

Each person at the Oscar party (about 100 people in all) put $5 into a pot, and whoever picked the most winners collected the $500 jackpot. Ten-year-old Jake won the prize.

"I'll never forget that day," the young actor said with a laugh. "I think I won because I was the only one who got the animated short right."

Winning a lucrative Oscar pool at such a tender age is amazing enough. When you consider that most of the people at that party probably were in the movie business, the feat is even more impressive, although it is one more glaring example of the truth in that old William Goldman quote about Hollywood: "Nobody knows anything."

Q: How important are the Oscars to people in the movie business?

PB: I'll let Jeffrey Caine answer that question. He was nominated for Best Achievement in Writing for his adapted screenplay of "The Constant Gardener." The writer, who called the professor from his home in Ireland, put it this way:

"I don't like to fly, but even I am willing to travel back and forth to Los Angeles during awards season. It's the kind of problem I enjoy having, like having to pay a huge amount of taxes. Somehow, you learn to live with it."

Q: Can a nomination make that big of a difference at the box office, or is it preferable to win the Oscar outright before seeing any tangible results?

PB: Of course, it's always better to win than to be nominated. Don't believe any hype to the contrary. However, there is evidence that a mere nomination can do wonders for a film's fortunes.

According to Daily Variety, an entertainment industry newspaper, last year's most honored movies, "Million Dollar Baby" and "Sideways," earned $56.5 million and $31 million, respectively, between the day the nominations were announced and Oscar night. In the last three years, the Best Picture nominees have taken in an average of $28 million during that same period.

Q: Some people are upset that "Walk the Line" wasn't nominated for Best Picture. What could the filmmakers have done differently to make the popular movie more Oscar-friendly?

PB: They could have fictionalized Johnny Cash's life, and turned him into a gay racist author and Mossad assassin who hunts down Joe McCarthy through the capitals of Europe.

---

Barry Koltnow: bkoltnow@ocregister.com



COMMENT:  I'm a Gyllenhaal fan (no apologies!) so I coldn't resist highlighting the section on Jake.  :)


« Last Edit: Feb 07, 2006, 09:15 AM by tpe »

Offline *Froggy*

  • Jack + Ennis
  • *
  • Posts: 10977
  • Gender: Female
  • No longer using this account: frog123
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #1 on: Feb 08, 2006, 09:34 AM »
COMMENT:  I'm a Gyllenhaal fan (no apologies!) so I coldn't resist highlighting the section on Jake.  :)

 ;D ;D ;D ;D

Support bacteria, they are the only culture some people have!


If you press me to say why I loved him, I can say no more than because he was he, and I was I.
~ Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (1533-1592) ~ (Thankx to gimmejack)

Offline Toadily

  • Mod-ChickY Brigade
  • Jack + Ennis
  • *
  • Posts: 2777
  • Gender: Female
  • "Friend, we got ourselves a situation here"
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #2 on: Feb 08, 2006, 07:45 PM »
Hey read this from Samuel Jackson, it reminds us of how it can be random

(this kind of makes me angry, I mean it's a privalege to vote he is living a very privaleged life...and to be like this about the voting is amoral I feel)

 Jackson: 'My Staff Fill In My Oscar Votes'

Actor Samuel L. Jackson risks losing his membership of the Academy Of Motion Pictures, Arts And Sciences after confessing he lets his family fill out his Academy Award nominations form.

The "Pulp Fiction" actor is among an elite group invited to choose the winners of the most prestigious prize in the awards calendar.

However, Jackson admits he has grown bored of the process and leaves his Oscar screener DVDs and forms lying around his home for others to choose their favorite actors and films.

He tells Fox News reporter Bill McCuddy, "The maid has watched them (the nominees), the cook's probably watched a lot of them, the nanny has, too. And they go by and put their check marks down on the ballot because they know you're not going to do it. And then the assistant goes by -- 'Oh, it's time for the ballot to go in. Oh, he hasn't filled this in. (Checking boxes) I like this, I like this,' and they send it in.

"I generally go down the ballot and look and see if any of my friends are nominated and I vote for them. Then I leave the ballot there for my wife to vote for all the other films that she watched that I knew I wasn't gonna watch, like the chick flicks or the flicks that I thought were gonna put me to sleep. I trust her opinion. And then we send the ballot in."
"it's Love, Blockhead!"
-Pierre Marivaux  The Triumph of Love

"To love an idea is to love it a little more than one should."  -Jean Rostand

Offline CherryCake

  • Jack
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
  • Gender: Male
  • You want a piece of me? YOU WANT A PIECE OF ME??!!
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #3 on: Feb 08, 2006, 08:40 PM »
 The movie has already won in so many ways whether it gets any more awards, and in a way, we all have too.
« Last Edit: Feb 08, 2006, 08:41 PM by CherryCake »
"Want some coffee, don't you? Piece a cherry cake?"




Hit me up on Yahoo: PieceOfCherryCake

Offline frenchcda

  • Laments of the hearts
  • Ennis
  • ******
  • Posts: 1020
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #4 on: Feb 16, 2006, 02:01 AM »
Remember if anyone has had the fortune to have found this forum trough Annie Proulx webbpage, we all know that we have won so much more than just a statuette, they have won our heart a million fold over and over again, for that alone no other film in recent history has had such an impact from one end of this continent to the other side of down under and every thing in between.
« Last Edit: Feb 16, 2006, 09:03 PM by frenchcda »
       what is a belief if not a lack of knowing


              My wounds are deeper than your desires

                      www.wordsofpeace.com

matsuki33

  • Guest
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #5 on: Mar 05, 2006, 04:14 PM »
Even if they don't win and oscar, they have open and broken the gate and the taboos of the Hollywood word because it showed them how a real love story should be, it is not just about awards it is about mind changing and Brokeback have changed the mind of many people and i incluse myself in that.

Offline tpe

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 96691
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #6 on: Mar 05, 2006, 04:21 PM »
To the academy:  remember that your actions will be judged by History (I have NO doubt about this).  Let not the Academy be weighed in the balance and be found wanting...

Offline CherryCake

  • Jack
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
  • Gender: Male
  • You want a piece of me? YOU WANT A PIECE OF ME??!!
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #7 on: Mar 06, 2006, 12:41 AM »
Well, I have seen the 2006 Oscars and I am glad BBm won what they won... but they already have something more valuable... all of our hearts... and millions of others's too.

This movie is a landmark and I hope the next great love story  will be more  uplifting with a love that does work out like we all want...
This is only the beginning I think....
"Want some coffee, don't you? Piece a cherry cake?"




Hit me up on Yahoo: PieceOfCherryCake

Offline ethan

  • Administrator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 11247
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #8 on: Mar 06, 2006, 12:43 AM »
Well, I have seen the 2006 Oscars and I am glad BBm won what they won... but they already have something more valuable... all of our hearts... and millions of others's too.

This movie is a landmark and I hope the next great love story  will be more  uplifting with a love that does work out like we all want...
This is only the beginning I think....

It is the begining - there will be more questions to answer.
Remembering Pierre (chameau) 1960-2015, a "Capricorn bro and crazy Frog Uncle from the North Pole." You are missed

Offline septuaginarian

  • Alma Jr.
  • **
  • Posts: 46
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Oscars: To care or not to care
« Reply #9 on: Mar 06, 2006, 11:00 AM »
Let not the Academy be weighed in the balance and be found wanting...

The Academy has been weighed in the balance and found wanting.
septuaginarian