Author Topic: Reviews ---- Internet  (Read 14893 times)

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
« Last Edit: Dec 23, 2005, 03:57 PM by brokebackmountain »
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
Rotten Tomato Fresh Rating 88%
« Reply #1 on: Dec 20, 2005, 12:41 AM »
This website offers a collection of critics' reviews for the western romance Brokeback Mountain that have been compiled to formulate a "fresh" or "rotten" rating. ;D[/size]

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/brokeback_mountain/
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline ranchgal

  • Lureen
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: Critics
« Reply #2 on: Dec 22, 2005, 03:14 PM »
I just really want to say THANK YOU to the admins of this board.
You are providing excellent links for us to keep up with reviews and articles on BBM and I really appreciate being able to read some of them.
I doubt I would have been able to find so many on my own and each one is special in its own way and relevant to the movie and to us as fans/and people who just want to know.
THANKS! You are doing an excellent job with this!! ;D ;D :-* ;D
« Last Edit: Dec 23, 2005, 03:58 PM by brokebackmountain »

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
Re: Critics
« Reply #3 on: Dec 22, 2005, 03:28 PM »
I just really want to say THANK YOU to the admins of this board.
You are providing excellent links for us to keep up with reviews and articles on BBM and I really appreciate being able to read some of them.
I doubt I would have been able to find so many on my own and each one is special in its own way and relevant to the movie and to us as fans/and people who just want to know.
THANKS! You are doing an excellent job with this!! ;D ;D :-* ;D

ranchgirl, thank you for your kind words. Now ya know how obssessed I am with this movie. If you have something new, please let us know[/size][/color]  ;D
« Last Edit: Dec 23, 2005, 03:58 PM by brokebackmountain »
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #4 on: Dec 23, 2005, 04:02 PM »
Audio Clip

Writer Mark Mobley doesn't think the gay Western Brokeback Mountain is quite the breakthrough some critics say it is. In fact, it may be further proof that we haven't come as far as we think we have.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5060329
« Last Edit: Jan 14, 2006, 03:41 AM by brokebackmountain »
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
REVIEWS - INTERNET
« Reply #5 on: Dec 26, 2005, 06:42 PM »
This is one of the great reviews for BBM.

"Very occasionally do the components of a film, (story, cast, music, cinematography, design and editing) come together in calm harmony and deliver an emotional experience that renews faith in the art.  Such an unforgettable result can be found in every frame of Brokeback Mountain thanks to director Ang Lee’s vision of the awful truth that struggles helplessly to the surface in the souls of married men whose real desires remain largely unfulfilled and hidden away."

READ the reveiw.
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
Willamette Week Online Reviews
« Reply #6 on: Dec 28, 2005, 06:18 PM »
An insightful review

Brokeback Blues, Part One
BY BYRON BECK | bbeck at wweek.com 
 
In last week's review of the groundbreaking new film Brokeback Mountain, WW's own David Walker commented on how Ang Lee's movie might humanize the way we look at gays. But for me, Brokeback, in all its repressed glory, reminded me just how dehumanized (read: abnormal and abhorrent) gay men throughout history most often have felt about themselves, both on and off the screen.

That's what makes this film so different. It's not afraid to expose something deeper. Essentially, it's all about the desperate pull of unrequited romantic love, an ache so strong, complicated and universal that it can tear you apart.

I remember the first time I felt that kind of crazy love. It was with a boy I met in community college. Craig and I became instant buddies, sharing the same interests in movies, music and (at least I thought) girls. I joined choir so I could be near him. I joined everything to be near him. But I never, ever made a move on him. After all, I was straight, and so was he. But, man, was I smitten.

Links to complete review below

http://www.wweek.com/editorial/3207/7057/
http://www.wweek.com/editorial/3208/7082/
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline *Froggy*

  • Jack + Ennis
  • *
  • Posts: 10977
  • Gender: Female
  • No longer using this account: frog123
Re: Willamette Week Online Reviews
« Reply #7 on: Dec 28, 2005, 06:23 PM »
That's what makes this film so different. It's not afraid to expose something deeper. Essentially, it's all about the desperate pull of unrequited romantic love, an ache so strong, complicated and universal that it can tear you apart.

Yep..know what it feels like..anyone else?
Support bacteria, they are the only culture some people have!


If you press me to say why I loved him, I can say no more than because he was he, and I was I.
~ Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (1533-1592) ~ (Thankx to gimmejack)

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
OPINION |  Anything But Straight
by Wayne Besen
December 21, 2005

Spoiler warning: Plot details, including the final scene of the movie, are revealed in this article.

If it weren't for gay people and gay-bashers, would anyone know about Wyoming? Sure, it is a beautiful state with some fine folks. But Matthew Shepard, Mary Cheney and now the movie "Brokeback Mountain" are the main reasons it makes news.

Read complete article HERE


I especially like the last three paragraphs

"The main reason that "Brokeback Mountain" will be a crossover hit is because of its universal message. Its success comes down to the ending scene, where Ennis del Mar is alone in his bare-bones trailer overlooking the haunting prairie. He opens a closet and wistfully touches the hanging clothes of Jack Twist, who has been murdered.

It is a gut-wrenching moment not only for the character, but also for moviegoers. They are forced to confront fears of loneliness and to ask themselves if they have lived life to the fullest and expressed their love to the people who matter most.

Gay or straight, the answer to such questions is all too often "no." In essence, we all have our own secret "Brokeback Mountain," and the movie subconsciously asks people to find their purpose and embrace their passion, because life is short and fragile. It is the searing, powerful message more than the fact the messengers are gay that will ultimately help people understand the struggles of gay people, and more importantly, themselves."

Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
Re: Critics
« Reply #9 on: Dec 29, 2005, 12:12 AM »
Here is a link to query review for BBM.

http://www.mrqe.com/lookup?isindex=Brokeback+Mountain
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
Re: Willamette Week Online Reviews
« Reply #10 on: Dec 29, 2005, 01:00 AM »
That's what makes this film so different. It's not afraid to expose something deeper. Essentially, it's all about the desperate pull of unrequited romantic love, an ache so strong, complicated and universal that it can tear you apart.

Yep..know what it feels like..anyone else?

After you have seen the movie, you know what it feels like..... :'( :'( :'( :'(
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline brokebackmountain

  • Brokebackmountain is now "ethan"
  • Administrator
  • Jack
  • ***
  • Posts: 762
  • Gender: Male
Review from Filmstew
« Reply #11 on: Dec 30, 2005, 01:48 AM »
Brokeback Mountain 

The gay and God-fearing righties have certainly had every opportunity to screen the film. Brokeback's been playing at film festivals as big as Toronto and Venice, and as small as Denver, for months. There's been time to mount a campaign. Is it possible that the Right have grown up? Or, at least, that the Red States have grown a heart?

Brokeback Mountain began on the deep sleuth tip as a long short story by Annie Proulx (The Shipping News) in The New Yorker in 1997. Because of its brevity, Proulx's language is crisp and terse. Characters speak precisely and intensely about how they feel in this melancholic 20-year tale of love and remorse between two young ranch hands, whose affair begins on the fictional Brokeback Mountain. The story immediately caused a small stir among the gay and urbane.

Randy Quaid, who has a supporting role in the movie, says he stole that New Yorker issue from the gym to finish reading the story. Gus van Sant wanted to direct a movie version with Matt Damon and Ben Affleck in the starring roles (What some would pay to see that...). For a while it looked like Larry McMurty and Diana Ossana's pitch-perfect adaptation would languish on the huge pile of good, but unmade scripts in this town. Its fate would echo The Front Runner, Patricia Nell Warren's seminal 1974 novel about a love affair between a college track coach and his out star runner. Tom Cruise and Paul Newman were rumored to be – ahem - attached for years.

More at

http://www.filmstew.com/Content/Article.asp?ContentID=12943&Pg=2
Born from their love..forever bound by ours.

Offline *Froggy*

  • Jack + Ennis
  • *
  • Posts: 10977
  • Gender: Female
  • No longer using this account: frog123
'Brokeback' showcases scenery, Ledger's performance
« Reply #12 on: Jan 05, 2006, 04:58 PM »
http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=BROKEBACK-FILM-01-04-06


'Brokeback' showcases scenery, Ledger's performance


Intro:
"Brokeback Mountain" is an extraordinary film about a cinematically ordinary subject: young love impeded. The impediments just happen to be greater in this case, since the couple in question (played by Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal) are Wyoming sheepherders in 1963.

What really sets the film apart from most movie romances is not its same-sex theme, but its visual grandeur and exquisite powers of observation.


Support bacteria, they are the only culture some people have!


If you press me to say why I loved him, I can say no more than because he was he, and I was I.
~ Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (1533-1592) ~ (Thankx to gimmejack)

Offline *Froggy*

  • Jack + Ennis
  • *
  • Posts: 10977
  • Gender: Female
  • No longer using this account: frog123
Reviews - Websites
« Reply #13 on: Jan 05, 2006, 06:02 PM »
http://www.pajiba.com/brokeback-mountain.htm

Sorry it's a long one!

Brokeback Mountain / Jeremy C. Fox


For a lot of people I know, both gay and straight, Brokeback Mountain is the most anticipated film of the year. Since it was first announced in 2003, it’s generally been known as “that gay cowboy movie”— the film in which, for the first time, two handsome Hollywood stars on the rise would appear in an honest-to-God gay romance, the movie that would give us both the love that dare not speak its name and the sex scenes that Tom Hanks (in Philadelphia) and Colin Farrell (in both A Home at the End of the World and Alexander) dare not shoot — but calling Brokeback Mountain “that gay cowboy movie” is about as reductive as calling The Godfather “that mafia movie.” It contains aspects of Westerns, gay coming-of-age films, and romantic melodramas, but to apply a facile label would be to underestimate its majestic sweep and its heartening and heartrending depth. It is, at its base, a film about the conflict between what a man is and what he needs.

The movie’s source is the final story in Annie Proulx’s book Close Range: Wyoming Stories, a collection of narratives about difficult lives lived in difficult circumstances by people who mostly don’t expect better. Her characters tend to be of two types: the dreamers who either buy into the romance of the West or can’t wait to escape it and the realists who accept their lot with stoic resilience. Brokeback Mountain has one of each: Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal), starry-eyed and caught up in heroic myths, and Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) a pragmatist who just lives his life the only way he knows how. In outline, the film is simple: Boy gets boy; boy loses boy; boy gets and loses boy over and over again across a lifetime — but there’s a whole world of suffering and grief in all that getting and losing, a permanent sense of loss, of possibilities forever forestalled, happiness perpetually found and then denied, lessons learned too late.

Over the past year or so, Heath Ledger has been involved in a project of rejiggering his career, eschewing the fluffy, audience-pleasing “blond-haired bimbo” roles that made him famous and saying f*** you to the Hollywood establishment, taking flaky character parts or leads that other young actors considered too risky. Here he confirms a suspicion that I developed after seeing Lords of Dogtown last summer and realizing that he’d played a sizable role without my ever recognizing him — he’s a startlingly gifted actor. He’s playing a character who’s superficially a throwback to the days of John Wayne and Gary Cooper, and he outwardly embodies the quintessential Western hero, squinting his eyes into black creases and murmuring his words through drawn lips, with an accent that’s a little bit Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade and a little bit Sam Elliott in everything (though with a lighter timbre). But Ennis doesn’t have it in him to be an icon. Having lost his parents as a child, he was early prepared for a hard life full of disappointments; he’s uncomplaining and compliant, willing to work any shit-job he can get, willing to perform any task unquestioningly.

While Ennis begins the film shambling like a young man whom life has already beaten, Jack struts around like a stud horse, intoxicated with the idea of being a rodeo star and proving his worth to his disapproving father and, by extension, the world. Gyllenhaal’s performance at first seems a little out of place; everyone around him (at this point, essentially Ledger, Randy Quaid, and some sheep) seems entirely at ease and unactorish, but on a second viewing I realized that what I was watching wasn’t Gyllenhaal’s performance — it was Jack’s. Jack is constantly trying to fill the role of Western hero, trying to impress; when we first see him, waiting with Ennis outside Joe Aguirre’s trailer-office, he leans against his truck in an exaggeratedly casual posture, with a “hey, cowboy” leer. The pose seems tentative here, but when he strikes it again later, after he knows he’s won Ennis, it’s triumphant. Unlike Ennis, Jack knows what he wants and is willing to go after it, though he may be only a little better at understanding it.

Ennis and Jack first meet in Signal, Wyoming, in 1963, when they take summer jobs tending sheep on Brokeback Mountain for Joe Aguirre (Quaid). Up on Brokeback, they endure harsh weather, minimal provisions, and predator attacks on the sheep, and gradually, over a period of days and weeks, they reveal themselves to each other and become close. When a night of too much whiskey and too much cold confines them to the same small tent, Jack, who’s clearly had it on his mind for a while, makes his move and they consummate their relationship. Early reports on the film suggested that the physical affection between Ennis and Jack would be downplayed; that perhaps they wouldn’t even kiss onscreen, but this encounter is treated no more or less gingerly than their later encounters with women. There’s no ambiguity about the sex, no discreet fade to black, but neither is it played for titillation or shock value. The connection between Ennis and Jack is powerful, even elemental, and sex is what cements it, a factor it would be dishonest to exclude, but there’s far more to it than that. Ennis gives Jack the tenderness and affection that he craves, offers him the acceptance that his father denied him, but what Jack gives Ennis is understanding; he’s the one person in the world around whom Ennis can drop his guard, though even with Jack it falls only so far. But what this relationship means to them, the powerful hold they have over each other, is something they have little means to express. Like many men, their feelings come out most clearly through aggression. The physical violence between Ennis and Jack is more than just a metaphor for the emotional violence of their connection, it’s the only way these inarticulate men are able to express the strength of their feelings. Though it’s tacitly clear in their every interaction, and though they often speak of the grip “this thing” has on them, throughout the film’s two and a quarter hours neither dares to say the word “love.”

Like many a homosexual encounter, theirs begins in drunkenness, when their inhibitions are lowered, and like many people after their first homosexual encounter, Ennis would like to believe that it’s a fluke, no big deal. “This is a one-shot thing we got goin’ on here. … You know I ain’t queer,” he tells Jack the next afternoon, hoping and perhaps still believing that it’s true. Ennis plays the “masculine” role and tries to preserve his image of himself as a man. He tries to separate sex from emotion, to convince himself that Jack is no more to him than a vehicle for his sexual drive, a partner better suited to the purpose than his hand but only marginally preferable to the sheep. Initially he can’t admit to himself that he’s getting anything more from Jack than a sexual release; when Jack wants to be treated as a lover, an equal, to be kissed and to be held, Ennis is terrified of the implicit suggestion that indeed he is queer, of surrendering his masculine prerogative, of assuming an ambiguous role. But need and regard for Jack overpower his fears and he relents. When the sheep-tending job is ending and they must separate, the full force of Ennis’ emotion comes down on him and he’s wrecked.

Ennis returns home and marries his sweetheart Alma (Michelle Williams), attempting to return to his old life with little success. Separated from Jack, he tries to make a Jack of Alma, wrestling with her in the snow as he’d wrestled with Jack up on Brokeback, too rough for a woman half his size, assigning her the sexual role Jack had assumed eagerly but which she accepts with grim marital devotion. Ennis becomes a caring father and he loves Alma as best he can, but his unfulfilled desires isolate him from his family. As the years pass, he increasingly draws away from them.

Jack moves to Texas for rodeoing but has little success. Though he’s drawn to men and looks for opportunities for hookups, he’s impressed when he meets a pretty young barrel-racer named Lureen Newsome (Anne Hathaway), though it’s suggested that her family’s wealth may have as much to do with her appeal as her personal charms. They marry and settle in Childress, Texas, where they both work for Lureen’s father, a big-time farm-equipment dealer. After four years have passed since that summer on the mountain, Jack finally heads back up to Wyoming and finds Ennis. When they meet again, their passion overtakes them, and they resume their relationship, planning several hunting or fishing trips a year so that they can be together, Jack driving 14-hour stretches at every opportunity to spend time alone with Ennis.

Ledger and Gyllenhaal inhabit their characters with powerful realism. As the years pass, the actors age subtly but persuasively. Jack grows a Dennis Weaver moustache and develops a beer gut; Ennis, who seemed old even when he was young, changes only in the hardening of his face, his skin growing more dry and taut, getting crepey around the eyes. The makeup artists have done great work here, but it’s Ledger and Gyllenhaal who have to carry these scenes off, and they do so admirably. Even in the latter part of the film, when Ledger is playing father to a young woman who can’t be more than six or seven years his junior, you don’t question it.

For those who care about a film adaptation’s faithfulness to its literary forerunner, the situation of Brokeback Mountain’s production — adapting a brief but thematically rich and emotionally resonant story — is perhaps ideal. The nature of film — its reliance on the visual and the active over the contemplative, its necessary brevity — makes it almost impossible to do full justice to a novel, but a short story doesn’t make such demands on a screenwriter. Rather than reducing or eliminating themes and events, he can use what was in the original and expand upon it, taking ideas that were only hinted at and exploring them at greater length, bringing out new meanings and enriching existing ones. This is what Brokeback Mountain’s screenwriters, Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana, have done; they know that Proulx’s story wasn’t broke, and they don’t try to fix it. They simply take it and allow it to sprawl out, to fill up the edges of the film with carefully observed details. McMurtry, a Texan and author of both contemporary and period novels and screenplays about the West, understands this world as well as anyone might; Ossana has lived much of her life in New Mexico and Arizona and has collaborated with McMurtry on novels and screenplays for over a decade. Their elaborations on Proulx’s story are keyed perfectly to her pitch. They’ve made the chronology more linear — an esthetically neutral decision in this case — but nothing of substance is missing, while some useful context and character motivations are added. They expand the story into other points of view, strengthening Proulx’s insights, giving a greater sense of the impact that Ennis and Jack’s love has on those around them, and adding such small but meaningful touches as a brown paper sack offered at just the right moment.

This is the first film Ang Lee has directed since Hulk, and he seems to have learned from that considerable misfire. He’s playing to his strengths here, and they are remarkable. Like many of the canniest observers of American life, Lee is an outsider who has adopted the American culture and who continues to see our society with a clearer eye than we may have ourselves. A native of Taiwan who has lived much of his adult life in the United States, Lee is adept at immersing himself in new cultures (New York Times critic Stephen Holden once called him “a kind of cinematic anthropologist”), recreating the world of his characters and examining it with a thoughtful, critical eye without resorting to parody. Lee has sometimes been accused of being too clinical, of keeping his subjects at an objective distance, but there’s none of that here. His empathy with these characters — each of them trapped in his or her own particular way — is palpable, yet he never tips over into sentimentality or lugubriousness.

Lee and his cinematographer, the versatile Rodrigo Prieto (21 Grams, Alexander), capture the feeling that runs through all of Proulx’s Wyoming stories, a sense of the permanence of the land and the transience of individual human lives. Their Wyoming (played with picture-postcard beauty by Alberta, Canada) is a painterly landscape of craggy mountains; rich, verdant grasslands; and a gorgeous, endless sky above, that serves as half of a metaphor for the characters’ dual lives; it’s the idyllic Eden where Ennis and Jack first meet and later find temporary escape, the place they can be together and be themselves without fear of judgment, contrasted against the constricted feel of the dusty, squalid cow towns and tacky, middle-class, southwestern suburbs where they spend most of their lives.

Lee takes the classic contrast between nature and civilization and uses it in a new way, as an implicit argument that the love between Ennis and Jack is a natural thing subverted by the arbitrary rules and definitions of manhood of their society. This might sound pretentious, and in many other hands it could be, but the beauty of Lee’s technique is its simplicity, its directness and lack of pretense, its ability to suggest without overplaying. He’s assisted by the somber elegance of Gustavo Santaolalla’s guitar-and-fiddle score, which evokes Country-Western music without quite entering its twangy domain and fits the moods Lee creates without overselling them.

Brokeback Mountain bears some similarities to Lee’s 1993 film The Wedding Banquet, in which a gay Chinese man living in New York with his lover must get himself a nice Chinese wife to appease his traditional parents back in Taiwan. Lee isn’t gay, but in films like The Wedding Banquet, Sense and Sensibility, The Ice Storm, and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon he’s shown an understanding of gay men and straight women — the disenfranchised of patriarchies — that’s greater than just about any other straight male director I can think of; as much as I admire Gus Van Sant (who is gay and who at one point expressed interest in directing Brokeback Mountain) I can’t imagine anyone doing this story better. As far as I know, none of the principals involved in the production is gay, yet they’ve constructed a story of love between men that surpasses all but the greatest films made by gay filmmakers, such as Van Sant’s My Own Private Idaho. Lee’s fascinated with people whose desires are thwarted by the strictures of society and the sacrifices demanded by tradition. And, in America, no tradition is more venerable than the notion of the laconic, stalwart western hero, the icon that Jack wishes he were and that Ennis falls to by dint of circumstance. It’s part of Ennis’ appeal to Jack that he embodies the cowboy archetype Jack aspires to.

Lee’s aware that he’s playing with myth, but he doesn’t muck about with it capriciously. Westerns are always about the end of a way of life, and Lee seems ambivalent about the changes that time has wrought. If Ennis and Jack were 20 years old in 2003 rather than 1963, their relationship would be easier but the West they knew would be gone. Brokeback Mountain uses the West as a backdrop, but it’s not structured like a Western, and it’s not intended as a criticism of the genre like McCabe and Mrs. Miller or Unforgiven, films that took the Western hero and made him either a buffoon or a sociopath; rather it’s a film that employs selected genre elements for their resonances, their associations. The mythic quality of the landscape and the lonesome figures moving through it only serves to emphasize the difficulty of these men playing the roles they’ve been given, the impossibility of living up to a myth.

The filmmakers have the guts to allow for the moral ambiguity of Ennis and Jack’s situation and explore the toll their secret takes on their families. No matter how powerful or natural their desires, by following them they’re hurting the women they married in their misdirected search for the passion they find only with each other. While I’d enjoyed Michelle Williams’ performances in small roles in recent films like Imaginary Heroes and The Baxter, until now my concept of her was essentially “that girl from ‘Dawson’s Creek.’” Those days are over. Her performance here is so deeply felt, authentic, and adult that it wipes away all my preconceived notions about her — not to mention blowing her former co-star Katie Holmes, whose recent performances haven’t strayed far from the Creek, right out of the water. When Williams’ Alma first witnesses her husband embracing a man, kissing him, her face expresses about 10 kinds of alarm, confusion, heartbreak, and horror. And Anne Hathaway, who plays Jack’s wife Lureen, might have forever been Mia Thermopolis to me but for her role here. She’s given less to play than Williams, but she makes the most of every moment. Her silent triumph when Jack finally stands up to her bullying father is exhilarating, and the slight catch in her throat that disturbs her frosty demeanor when she speaks to Ennis for the first and last time, the subtle suggestion that she’s finally learned her husband’s secret, completely transforms the way we see her character. Even the actors in roles that count for little more than cameos, such as the tiny part played by an unrecognizable Anna Faris, or the slightly larger role given to Linda Cardellini, hit home. It’s as if Lee had been asked to prove that every B-list actress in Hollywood under 30 had unplumbed depths. There’s not a performer in the film who doesn’t stretch (well, maybe Randy Quaid, but it’s nice to see him in a respectable role again), and there’s not one who fails.

Lee is aware of his film’s place in the world, that no one will approach it as just a romance and that much more attention will be given it than if the actors were nobodies, and his approach is, I think, the best possible one, low-key and matter-of-fact, making the story feel genuine and simple and true. Brokeback Mountain is a film of great subtlety and precise observation, a film for which the best descriptors are words like “rich” and “authentic” and, possibly, “perfect.” After three viewings and some careful consideration, I’m damned if I can find a significant flaw. There are one or two lines of dialogue that I might change, and Gyllenhaal’s early scenes made more sense to me upon the second viewing, but these are quibbles. In a medium where the important decisions are almost always dictated by commerce rather than art, Brokeback Mountain is as close to perfection as we are likely to get.

Jeremy C. Fox is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Online Film Critics Society.
Support bacteria, they are the only culture some people have!


If you press me to say why I loved him, I can say no more than because he was he, and I was I.
~ Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (1533-1592) ~ (Thankx to gimmejack)

Offline Apollonos

  • Lureen
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • Gender: Male
Reviews - Websites
« Reply #14 on: Jan 06, 2006, 04:23 AM »
‘Brokeback Mountain’ earns its hype
Grade: A
By Glenn Davis

Films dealing with tragic romances have been around for as long as movies have been made. There have been love stories of all shapes and sizes. However, perhaps the most unconventional love story I have ever seen is “Brokeback Mountain.” It is a beautiful and touching film that is one of the year’s strongest.


“Brokeback Mountain,” which many people know as ‘the gay cowboy movie,’ stars Heath Ledger (“A Knight’s Tale”) and Jake Gyllenhaal (“Donnie Darko”) as two cowboys hired to herd cattle for a summer over a rough patch on Wyoming known as Brokeback Mountain. The two men form a close bond rather quickly while alone on the mountain. During the course of this summer, the two rugged cowboys begin a forbidden relationship that both excites and scares them.

The movie begins in 1962, when there was no tolerance for this type of relationship. After their summer on Brokeback Mountain, Ennis (Ledger) goes back home to his beautiful fiancée (Michelle Williams) where he works as a ranch hand, and Jack (Gyllenhaal) goes back to his life as a rodeo cowboy. The film spans the next 20 years of the two cowboys’ lives.

“Brokeback Mountain” is a masterfully directed film that is dramatic and surprisingly very touching.           

The ever-talented Ang Lee directed the film. With Lee’s track record, he truly proves that he cannot be contained within a certain genre. From British Comedy in “Sense and Sensibility” to kung fu in “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon,” Ang Lee is a real renaissance man. Sure, Lee did stumble a bit with his comic book dud “The Hulk,” but “Brokeback Mountain” reminds us all of what a true talent Lee is. The scenes in the “big sky” country of Wyoming are some of the most awe-inspiring camera work I’ve ever seen.

As for our two cowboys, Ledger and Gyllenhaal prove that they are first and foremost actors – not movie stars. Gyllenhaal already has a powerful performance this year with his work in “Jarhead.” The one, two combo of “Jarhead” and “Brokeback Mountain” should prove to everyone that Gyllenhaal is the real deal.

As for Heath Ledger, he’s had a few good performances in some fun movies such as “A Knight’s Tale” and “Lords of Dogtown,” but nothing Ledger has ever done has shown off his talent as much as his role in “Brokeback Mountain.” Much like Charlize Theron surprised everyone in “Monster,” Ledger really proves how good of an actor he is. I will be truly shocked if Ledger doesn’t get an Oscar Nomination for his work here, it’s that good. Ledger sells every scene he’s in, where another actor could have lost it and made the work look corny.

“Brokeback Mountain” also has very strong supporting work from Michelle Williams (“Dawson’s Creek”). Williams plays Ledger’s fiancée and eventual wife, who discovers his secret relationship with Gyllenhaal and has to live with it. Also showing strong supporting work is Anne Hathaway (“Princess Diaries”) as Gyllenhaal’s suspecting wife who doesn’t ask too many questions regarding her husband’s frequent fishing trips.

So in the end, “Brokeback Mountain” is a tragic story of a forbidden love. Sure, the subject matter is going to be uncomfortable for a lot of people. I know I was very skeptical going into this film how I would feel, but it’s done in such a tasteful way that you can’t help but be a bit moved by the result.     

Offline Apollonos

  • Lureen
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • Gender: Male
Reviews - Websites
« Reply #15 on: Jan 06, 2006, 04:41 AM »


I thought this review from Blogcritics was beautiful!

http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/12/09/135436.php

Movie Review: Brokeback Mountain

December 09, 2005
Alisha Karabinus
Believe the hype -- this movie is as good as you've heard. It may even be better. Brokeback Mountain is a sweeping tale of stymied love spanning twenty years, directed by the master of uncomfortable, unfulfilled love stories (The Ice Storm, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon), Ang Lee. Lee knows how to wrangle pain from his actors, and here he is in his element with two characters who have spent their lives tamping down the feelings that could get them killed.

Yes, if you have to label everything and tie up the characters and story into neat little packages, then okay: Brokeback Mountain is about gay cowboys (but before you ask, alas, no pudding). But writing this film off with a few controversial labels doesn't do it justice. If nothing else, one hopes that this movie can help to shed light on the notion that labels and stereotypes are often inadequate when it comes to sexuality. Ennis del Mar and Jack Twist are men (fully realized in tremendous, career-making performances by Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal) who fall in love, but does it make them gay? Are we defined by labels, or by the actions in our lives?

Part of the controversy surrounding this film lies in the perception that the movie is encouraging homosexual men to marry and live out "traditional" lives with a wife and children, the nuclear family American dream. There seems to be some feeling that this is a particularly unhealthy idea to propagate now when the delicate issue of gay rights is being debated across the country. What these people don't seem to realize is that this film doesn't advocate anything except the idea that being true to one's self is difficult in any time and any place - and everyone struggles with that, homo- or heterosexual, male or female, rich or poor. For Ennis and Jack, their inability (due to upbringing, culture, and society) to live out the lives they might have otherwise chosen is their downfall. There's nothing in the film that encourages gay men to act "straight."

Nor is the film some sort of flamboyant cavalcade of homosexuality that some would like you to think. It's difficult for me to refer to Ennis and Jack with the accepted labels of sexuality because sexuality is a rich facet of our selves, multi-layered and deep. It is not a simple question for many, and that struggle is one of the story's strengths. Is Brokeback Mountain really about "gay cowboys?"

In the film, there are clues that for Jack, the potential at least is present from the beginning. When he first sees Ennis, they are just two cowboys waiting outside a trailer and hoping to leave with a job. Ennis is stoic, the perfect strong, silent type... but Jack sees something in the other man's lanky form that calls to him, and he shifts restlessly against his truck, perfecting a masculine lean... and even then, his vulnerability, his need for acceptance and love is so clear that it's heartbreaking. From that moment, silent and long, marked by Jack peeking at Ennis from under the brim of his hat, we can see their entire relationship laid out before them, down to its inevitable tragic end. Gyllenhaal really shines here in and in the scenes on the mountain, when the two are looking after a large flock of sheep. There is one scene in particular, when Ennis strips down to wash and Jack must... not... look... He goes on peeling potatoes for supper, but it is apparently from the tension in his jaw and his forcefully blank expression that the attraction that sparked at their first meeting has, for him, grown into a hungry flame.

But Heath Ledger's mumbling Ennis is more difficult to define. At the beginning of that fateful summer in 1963, he is engaged and is hoping to save up a little extra cash for his fall wedding. He's the real cowboy, all dusty workmanship next to the flashy, bull-riding Jack Twist. Whereas Jack bitches about the sheep, the rules, the job, and anything that crops up, Ennis accepts his place and does what is expected (a quality that will shape his life). When the fateful moment comes, on a cold night that brings the two men together in a tent against the chill outside, Ennis reacts to Jack's first sexual overture with violence, slapping him away. When he gives in, a heartbeat later, there is an air of prison sex about the scene. These men are stuck on a mountaintop for months with no release. They might as well be in prison. And Ennis seems to give it no more thought than that. They discuss it later, once:

Ennis: This is a one-shot thing we got going on here.
Jack: Nobody's business but ours.
Ennis: You know I ain't queer.
Jack: Me neither.

And they move on, marrying... Jack because it's convenient (or inconvenient; there is some question here that his marriage is of the shotgun variety) and Ennis because that's what men do. And for Ennis, that marriage at first seems happy. After his initial violent and ill reaction to the end of that summer (he collapses in the shadow of a building, dry-heaving and holding back tears), life is okay. He works hard, but that's what men do. His wife Alma (played by Ledger's real life love Michelle Williams) has a couple of kids. And they share tender moments among the pain of being poor and saddled with children. The relationship is normal, if somewhat perfunctory, but so are many marriages. If not for the reappearance of Jack, Ennis might have lived out his life just like that.

There is one really excellent scene during Ennis and Alma's short-lived marriage that seems slightly changed from the story but still amazingly effective. They are in bed, and Alma is trying to convince Ennis that they should move "into town." The conversation doesn't get very far; as with many young couples with children, they get distracted by the excitement of a few moments alone and the talk fades into sex. In the story, Ennis is careful to put his wife's needs before his own and it is mentioned that she doesn't enjoy the actual act of intercourse. In the film, it seems more that they are both enjoying the moment - loving one another and sinking into the physicality of simply being together - and then suddenly, Ennis turns Alma over and enters her from behind. It is the same in the story, but here, translated to a visual medium, it is a very telling moment. Ennis, no matter how far down he keeps his feelings, wants to love and feel love, and in this idyllic moment with his wife, he tries to recreate the only real happiness he has ever known - with Jack - by taking her the same way. It is a breathless moment, and like so many of the film's best scenes, extraordinarily subtle.

Is Brokeback Mountain about gay cowboys? Yes and no. But by labeling the characters, and the film, the fact that it is a painful, momentous, beautiful love story is ignored. It's an epic Western romance. Call it that and let it go.


But it's also a story about freedom, the importance of the freedom to let go and be yourself. Jack and Ennis don't have that freedom, no matter how much Jack wants it. Once they are reunited, after four years, a sinister memory casts a pall over any hope that this romance would end happily. As a child, his father took Ennis and his brother to see the tattered corpse of a rancher who lived alone with another man. Among other things, "they" had taken a tire iron to the man... and that image, and the thought of the tire iron, would take on almost mythic proportions for Ennis throughout his life. Except for one impassioned semi-public moment, Ennis keeps his feelings for Jack under tight control and never entertains the idea of giving it all up to run away with his lover, not even when it means he might lose him. He never considers letting go -- because Ennis, the realist, knows what happens to the men who let go.

Annie Proulx's terse short story was about an intense love between two men who were ill-equipped to deal with any feelings at all. And the film, adapted by Larry McMurtry and writing partner Diana Ossana, captures the story more accurately than most adaptations. The changes are minimal, limited to a little necessary expansion of minor characters and a lengthening of the buildup between Ennis and Jack. Most of the original dialogue is captured faithfully - often word for word. But the real achievement here, in my view, is that the very landscape itself seems almost a character in the film - which is apt, as their physical origin acts as strongly on Jack and Ennis as any other factor in their lives.

Ang Lee and cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto of Amores Perros capture the dust of the colorless town where Ennis is trapped with his wife Alma in such a way that we feel trapped right there with them. Much has been made of the shots of the mountains and the Wyoming sky, shots that evoke the postcards Jack and Ennis use to plan their trysts, but for me the most stunningly effective translation of the story is in that town. Maybe it's because I spent scattered years of my childhood in such places, where being "working class" really meant poor, but I find it easy to sink into the sameness of the days and can understand how momentous it is when, four years after their summer together, Ennis gets the first postcard from Jack. By then, something different, anything different, is huge.

I can't say enough about the performances in this film. Everyone is fantastic, from the two leads and their wives down to the supporting roles - most notable here is Randy Quaid as the rancher whose sheep bring Jack and Ennis together in the first place. Michelle Williams and Anne Hathaway are excellent as the wives, though Anne Hathaway (of The Princess Diaries) doesn't age physically as well as the other characters in the film (hardly her fault). I have a feeling she won't be doing any more Disney films after her scene here stripping and seducing Jack in the backseat of her car. Williams has one of the movie's best - and most painful - moments when she steps to the door, eager to see the friend that had her reserved husband all but bouncing on his toes with excitement, and finds them kissing with a passion she has never shared with Ennis.

But the movie belongs to the men, and ultimately to Heath Ledger, though Jake Gyllenhaal is truly great as Jack Twist. It takes some time to accept Gyllenhaal's voice in this role; I found it a little jarring at first, the earnest, youthful quality in his voice comes through a little too strongly in the opening scenes, but he relaxes into the role and that fades.

But Heath Ledger. Oh, Heath! What have you been doing all this time? Ang Lee, on Charlie Rose a few nights ago, mentioned Ledger's role in Monster's Ball as a factor in his casting here, and it's unsurprising - he's had some good performances in some mediocre movies, and that is the only opportunity he's really had to shine in a strong and deeply emotional role. Ledger carries this film, easily and effortlessly. This is no insult to the other performances - there are no false chords in this romantic symphony - but in the end, it is Ennis you will remember, Ennis clutching the shirts he and Jack wore in 1963, shirts that Jack kept for twenty years, and Ledger pours forth decades of pain and struggle in a brief moment as he clutches those shirts.

Lee himself has had nothing but praise for Ledger in the role:

I feel very fortunate to have Heath in the movie. He's a natural. He has great coordination, he's very dedicated, and he does his preparation. He meticulously aims towards a certain target and firmly believes in what he's doing... He and I talked about how Ennis doesn't speak much. Deep inside, he has a big fear from a childhood traumatic experience, and from his awakening to his own sexuality, which is not allowed to be expressed in the West. Ennis has to cover that up with his attitude and, sometimes, violence. He can get very violent, because of how scared he is. So he's a scared kid inside, playing a Western kind of cool. Heath not only had to carry his own character and the whole character of the West, but carry the movie - and he underplayed powerfully.
But don't take it from the director - go see it for yourself. See Brokeback Mountain not for the controversy, or for any statements about society (there aren't any), or even for the performances (though it'd be worth it). See it because so few modern films tackle the notion that love is work, and that it's usually not a happy-fun-time where everything is rainbows and lollipops in a meadow. Love is violent and intense, it's painful and more than anything, it's hard, but even then it's beautiful. It's wonderful. It's what so many of us live for. And Brokeback Mountain is about the kind of love that lasts forever - it's a force of nature.

Brokeback Mountain opens today in selected cities, but will not hit wide release (to cities like my native Little Rock) until an as yet undetermined date in January.http://

richardwatts

  • Guest
New Internet review from Australia
« Reply #16 on: Jan 18, 2006, 06:34 AM »
Here's the link for a new review of the film from the national Australian website The Program, a federally funded youth arts website. I should admit that it's my review, so obviously I'm biased, but hopefully you'll all enjoy it all the same...

http://www.theprogram.net.au/reviewsSub.asp?id=3246&state=1

To give you a taste of what I said:

"Unlike most films, which spoon-feed information to their audiences through awkward and expository dialogue, Brokeback Mountain assumes its audience’s intelligence, and tells its story largely through glance and gesture. While some might complain that the film lacks passion, as its male leads never once speak the words “I love you,” to one another, their longing eyes speak volumes for those who are prepared to look for such messages. Similarly its pace, while slow by the standard of contemporary blockbusters, allows the story time to mature in such a way that its inexorable climax, when it arrives, is devastating."

Offline tpe

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 96691
Re: New Internet review from Australia
« Reply #17 on: Jan 18, 2006, 09:24 AM »
Here's the link for a new review of the film from the national Australian website The Program, a federally funded youth arts website. I should admit that it's my review, so obviously I'm biased, but hopefully you'll all enjoy it all the same...

http://www.theprogram.net.au/reviewsSub.asp?id=3246&state=1

To give you a taste of what I said:

"Unlike most films, which spoon-feed information to their audiences through awkward and expository dialogue, Brokeback Mountain assumes its audience’s intelligence, and tells its story largely through glance and gesture. While some might complain that the film lacks passion, as its male leads never once speak the words “I love you,” to one another, their longing eyes speak volumes for those who are prepared to look for such messages. Similarly its pace, while slow by the standard of contemporary blockbusters, allows the story time to mature in such a way that its inexorable climax, when it arrives, is devastating."

Many thanks, richardwatts.  What you said rings so true to me.  It is the power of those things unsaid that so moves us the most.

Offline *Froggy*

  • Jack + Ennis
  • *
  • Posts: 10977
  • Gender: Female
  • No longer using this account: frog123
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #18 on: Jan 21, 2006, 07:59 PM »
Support bacteria, they are the only culture some people have!


If you press me to say why I loved him, I can say no more than because he was he, and I was I.
~ Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (1533-1592) ~ (Thankx to gimmejack)

Offline tpe

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 96691
One of the Most Complelling Opinions I have Read...
« Reply #19 on: Jan 23, 2006, 11:55 AM »
From http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/20060122202039758
A superbly laid out opinion, IMHO...


So you didnt like Brokeback Mountain?
Posted Monday, January 23 2006 @ 06:20 AM PST by Parth Vasa
Filed under: Opinion
                                                       
What happens if the Oscar committee doesn’t nominate the movie ? Or worse, nominates it but doesn’t deem it Oscar-worthy; What would it say about the Academy? Is it an important movie? You didn’t like it?! How could you not? You insensitive, old fashioned, moron, you !

How much is our guilt, of not being an open enough society, responsible for the great reviews and the shower of affection that this film has received? It is a fine film. But in the best of the times it would just be another beautifully shot, hauntingly scored, perfectly acted and blatantly sentimental love story [I don't agree that BBM is sentimental -- tpe]. If it was the year of audiences, critiques and awards turning liberal what happened to “Dying Gaul” or “Transamerica” or “Breakfast on Pluto”?

People have written reviews of this film and those reviews have been reviewed. Every reviewer finding fault in the film has been criticized liberally. For a second, take away the fact that the lead characters are gay men. Imagine, may be, another forbidden love theme. Would this movie still be as powerful? May be it is illogical to remove that part of the story. That would be imagining “Grapes of Wrath” without the draught in the heartland. Would Syriana work if you take a way the Middle East conflict? Not too sure. Or Munich without Munich Olympics? It actually could.

Like many films that came out in last part of 2005 the biggest claim to fame of Brokeback Mountain was the fact that it touched a taboo. Considering it a groundbreaking and brave effort would not only be wrong but also an injustice to the story the film was based upon. The film was made recently but the story has been there since years. For all these years, it only existed in “New Yorker” archives and some rare bohemian conversations.

Why this sudden rush of affection, then? The film’s greatest achievement is that it makes the characters very much like any guys you would know. They could be your gym buddies or your roommates; very much against the stereotypes that have plagued the popular media. Some reviewers have commented that even such a bold movie shied away from an explicit sex scene between the men. If they didn’t shy away, there wouldn’t be so much sympathy and love for the story. It is a story of a repressed love and repressed expression shows it perfectly. Instead of trying to prove that some famous warrior or famous poet was also gay, this movie just shows very natural, somewhat unabashed but repressed love between two very normal guys. Instead of challenging or accusing the audience it poignantly becomes the part of it.

Some believe that art should just be art with no major social significance; I do not. Art can change times; books have, movies can. But I don’t like the Vitamin Water treatment that we have been giving to films. Films become good because they are important, not because they are good. Talking of liberalism and open mindedness, they will be truly achieved when we can casually nod at an imperfectly made movie about a taboo subject (a gay relationship or arms trade or terrorism or politics) and walk forward looking for a perfectly made movie for our affection


sharve

  • Guest
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #20 on: Jan 25, 2006, 08:05 PM »
Found this on 365.gay today and I thought it ight be of interest...

http://www.365gay.com/opinion/wocknerWire/wocknerWire.htm


The Wockner Wire

by Rex Wockner
 








 
Brokeback Mania

"'Brokeback' proves potent in theaters," said the headline in The Oklahoman daily newspaper.

"I finally got to see it on New Year's Day at the Magnolia and went with my 13-year-old," Dallas Mayor Laura Miller told the Dallas Voice. "I cried several times. It was just an incredible film, one that will hopefully open some people's hearts and make everyone more tolerant. Love is love, pure and simple."

"No American film before has portrayed love between two men as something this pure and sacred," said Newsweek. "As such, it has the potential to change the national conversation and to challenge people's ideas about the value and validity of same-sex relationships."

"The appeal is universal," said San Jose Mercury News columnist Sue Hutchinson. "As tragic on-screen lovers go, Ali MacGraw and Ryan O'Neal have nothing on the two Brokeback cowboys. No wonder it seems to be turning into a date movie -- for heterosexuals."

And author Annie Proulx, who wrote the short story that was made into the movie, told the AP: "I think this country is hungry for this story. t's a love story and there's hardly much love around these days. I think people are sick of divisiveness, hate-mongering, disasters, war, loss and need and want a reminder that sometimes love comes along that is strong and permanent, and that it can happen to anyone."

Indeed, it feels like the whole country is gaga for this film in which two cowboys fall in love in the wrong place at the wrong time and full-on bonk on screen.

This is the same country where 45 states explicitly ban same-sex marriage -- and 19 of them have done so by amending their constitutions to permanently discriminate against us.

So what gives?

I'm not sure. But here are some possible explanations for why Brokeback Mountain is filling theaters.

1. Good art is good art. This is a very good film. A very good film can overcome subject matter that might be problematic in an ordinary film.

2. Buzz buzz buzz. When is the last time a movie had this much buzz? People care about that. They don't want to be left out. At a certain point, one has to go see a movie with this much buzz, no matter what it's about.

3. The people who voted for same-sex marriage bans aren't seeing the movie. The people who voted against same-sex marriage bans are seeing the movie. That's still a lot of people.

4. There are a lot of folks who are neither fundamentalist Christian gay-haters nor flag-waving PFLAG gay-lovers. They're somewhere in the middle. They may not be fully sure what they think of gay people. Maybe they want more exposure, more information. Brokeback Mountain gives them that.

5. Women, who always poll more gay-friendly than men, are taking men to see it with them.

6. Every gay person in America is seeing this film. Twice. That's a lot of movie tickets.

7. Or maybe there's no rational explanation. Maybe we live in a country where people vote to amend their state constitution to dump on gay people and then go to the movies and cheer for certain kinds of gay people on screen.

That's likely as good an explanation as any.

This may not be a country where the majority of people place a high value on intellectual consistency.

Whatever the case, whatever it is that's filling theaters in small cities and red states, it's a very good thing. Because this film is good enough to possibly change some minds or hearts.

I've argued with politicians who believe gays need to focus on political lobbying and letter writing. I've said that TV and movies and media are just as important, if not more important, to the task of achieving equality for gay people.

I think Brokeback Mountain may be the piece of evidence my argument needed.

Meanwhile, I was pleased to see that novelist Brett Hartinger got the same take-home message from the movie that I laid out in my last column -- a message that many straight reviewers seem to have missed.

Writing at AfterElton Jan. 16, Hartinger noted: "This is what Brokeback Mountain implicitly asks of gay movie-goers: to love now, passionately, regardless of the cost. Seize the day, because one day, possibly before you know it, it will be too late."

©365Gay.com 2006
 



Offline streetskater

  • Alma Jr.
  • **
  • Posts: 23
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #21 on: Jan 31, 2006, 04:17 AM »
Audio ClipWriter Mark Mobley doesn't think the gay Western Brokeback Mountain is quite the breakthrough some critics say it is. In fact, it may be further proof that we haven't come as far as we think we have.

On some level I completely agree with Mark--and I've written comments like:
"....Ann Proulx seems to have channeled the very spirit of Tennessee Williams and transplanted him from the Deep Coastal South to the Great Plains of Wyoming. These souls in Brokeback Mountain are so tortured it is hard to imagine the movie fails to satisfy the most 50's era moralists.  It's Sebastian Venable gruesomely canalized as Elizabeth Taylor screams in horror:  It's Audrey Hepburn looking on in revulsion as Martha Dobie twists at the end of a Suicide Noose.  Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell should leave the cinema cheering...
 
...That the Short Story and movie actually portray intense sexual/romantic passion between two men (two reining Hollywood "Hunks")  simply is NOT sufficient to make Brokeback Mountain THE Gay Anthem Movie of all time....It is a wonderful movie, on many other grounds, but one wonders if it won't traumatize generations of our gay brothers and sisters for years to come."


And Yet,
there is something about Brokeback that, despite all the above does somehow feel groundbreaking.  Perhaps it the tender touch of Ang Lee direction where his sympathies are obvious WITH the protagonists.   And maybe an essential difference is that in A Children's Hour there is a sense of just punishment being meted out to the sexually errant Miss Dobie while in Brokeback Mountain there is the overwhelming sense that things SHOULD have been able to work out better for Ennis and Jack. 

I'm not saying I'm endorsing the gruesome gay-bash murder foreshadowing a perhaps similar fate to befall Jack.  I honestly think the story could have been written without those melodramatic touches.  But I'm prepared to accept BM with it's flaws and still find it an extraordinary experience.

Offline Seersha

  • Cassie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #22 on: Feb 01, 2006, 03:39 PM »
http://movies.ninemsn.com.au/movie.aspx?id=74778

"Who would have thought that a movie about two cowboys in love would be the sensation of the season? There's something going on in them hills and it ain't ropin' and rustlin'.

Brokeback Mountain has made its mark because it is the most affecting romance seen on our screens for some time. Its themes are so universal to make the gender of the lovers irrelevant, while it's absolutely crucial to the novelty and nuance of this film. In an industry and art form that has covered all the contours of the human heart, here is a film with something startlingly new to relate about a subject matter that, itself, is as old as air.

Or at least as rare as the air on Brokeback Mountain, home to the hearts of two modern cowboys who find themselves inexplicably and irresistibly drawn to each other, so much so that they break every convention known to them to come together as often as they can over 20 years.

Much has been made of the hot and sweaty man-on-man action in this film but really there's more erotic charge on the average football field than the foothills of Brokeback Mountain. What is probably the most disturbing thing about this film to some is its acknowledgement that masculine men could be homosexual and their homosexuality is perhaps the most masculine thing about them. The focus on the effeminacy of gay men has hidden the fact that two men having sex can be an extraordinarily powerful exchange.

What this film also demonstrates is that there are married men who have sex with men and, as any active gay man will tell you, it's impossible to be gay in these days and not be hit on by somebody's husband, somebody's father. It is the great undiscovered scandal of modern life. These are radical realisations from a film industry that has promoted images of gay men as simpering predators or neutered best friends.

Unexpectedly, two of Hollywood's most attractive young blades have cut through the stereotypes to create bold new characters. Jake Gyllenhaal is the heart of the film but it is Heath Ledger who is utterly extraordinary and exceptional in every way. His force and focus in this role is like nothing he has brought to the screen before. Director Ang Lee has created a truly original film that not only rewrites the western but the romance as well. His vision is splendid and with the aid of cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto he creates a vivid landscape in Brokeback Mountain and beyond. It is hard to think how this film could be bettered.

By Kerry Bashford"

Offline chameau

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 28148
  • Gender: Male
  • Miss ya little darlin'
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #23 on: Feb 01, 2006, 03:43 PM »
Thanks for posting this Seersha
La dictature c'est ''ferme ta geule'', la démocratie c'est ''cause toujours''
 Jean-Louis Barrault

Offline streetskater

  • Alma Jr.
  • **
  • Posts: 23
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #24 on: Feb 02, 2006, 10:09 AM »
"What is probably the most disturbing thing about this film to some is its acknowledgement that masculine men could be homosexual and their homosexuality is perhaps the most masculine thing about them.

Yup, masculine gay men is still a bit of a revelation to a lot of folks--even a lot of gay folks.  It would almost seem to be the inevitable outcome of males who are fundamentally attracted to other males--an eroticism of all things masculine and therefore the 'hypermasculinization' of gay men.  And yet, other "cultural" forces seem to be at play in modern cultures to promulgate the stereotype of gay males as largely, if not mostly, effeminate.  Certainly if you could transpose yourself back to Ancient Sparta you'd probably see hyper masculine "gay" males as the accepted stereotype.

So one wonders if effeminate gay males isn't just another consequence of cultural pressure to behave within tightly confined  "norms".

Offline tpe

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 96691
View From the Heart
« Reply #25 on: Feb 02, 2006, 05:00 PM »
I came across this beautifully written opinion from the Oklahoma Daily: http://www.oudaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/01/31/43e02f5925528

The author identifies himself as a white male evangelical.  I would also add that he has a big heart.

God will recognize his own. :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Opinion     
Your Views: 2-1-06
January 31, 2006

‘Brokeback' is well-made and creates better insight

Instead of a slightly delayed criticism of Daniel Beck’s article on the movie “Brokeback Mountain,” I thought I might instead give my own impressions of the film.

I am no film critic, but I enjoyed the stark, honest beauty of Ang Lee’s depiction of both the open West and small Western towns.

I think it is the first film I’ve ever seen that correctly portrays the West that I have seen as a child and young man.

I enjoyed the acting of both male leads and both female leads, each one calmly reverberating the Western demeanor of any number of people I’ve known, from my grandparents to my teachers or co-workers.

I saw the film in Norman, not a notoriously progressive American city, but more than half of my fellow moviegoers were gray-headed.

I think the setting of the film, far more than the subject matter, may explain its success in the middle part of the United States.

For my own part, I would recommend the film, not as a love story, western or controversial topical piece, though I suppose it is all of those things, but as a film that gets it right in all aspects of movie-making: cinematography, direction, music, acting, dialogue, script, costumes and so on.

I suppose that the fact that the relationship between the male leads was homosexual is what will attract the most attention to this film, but I defy even the harshest critic of the film to postulate a better, more plausible dramatic device to illustrate unfulfilled longing (certainly an inescapable element of any human life) than a male homosexual relationship in the American West.

But even if I must face the controversy head-on, I will have to admit that as a resident of central Oklahoma for most of my life and a white, male evangelical, my open-eyed personal experience with gay men has been limited.

Much of what I think I know comes from the media. Shows like “Will and Grace” or “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” have been beneficial in helping gay men become more universally accepted in this country.

I think perhaps their flaw is that they present only one type of gay man: a fashion-conscious, overtly feminine and often frivolous character.

I think this film made me aware, for the first time, that sexuality may be the most terribly complex of all human attributes and, just as heterosexuality encompasses any number of personality characteristics, so must homosexuality.

Why should it be strange to me that a stoic ranch hand — a quintessentially masculine character in my American mind — should also be a gay man?

I hope that this film is one of the last steps toward the issue of homosexuality ceasing to be an issue in my own mind: moving from hatred or disgust, to suspicion, to acceptance of a caricature, to simple acceptance.
 
-- George Wright, second year law student

« Last Edit: Feb 02, 2006, 05:19 PM by tpe »

Offline chameau

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 28148
  • Gender: Male
  • Miss ya little darlin'
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #26 on: Feb 02, 2006, 05:11 PM »
Thanks por posting TPE
La dictature c'est ''ferme ta geule'', la démocratie c'est ''cause toujours''
 Jean-Louis Barrault

Offline tpe

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 96691
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #27 on: Feb 02, 2006, 05:28 PM »
Thanks por posting TPE

Thanks Pierre.  It is always great to be reminded/reassured that BBM truly does have the power to change people's minds. 

Offline chameau

  • Moderator
  • Jack + Ennis
  • ***
  • Posts: 28148
  • Gender: Male
  • Miss ya little darlin'
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #28 on: Feb 02, 2006, 05:33 PM »
Thanks Poe posting TPE

Thanks Pierre.  It is always great to be reminded/reassured that BBM truly does have the power to change people's minds. 

Specially from a straight male!
La dictature c'est ''ferme ta geule'', la démocratie c'est ''cause toujours''
 Jean-Louis Barrault

Offline malawix

  • Jack + Ennis
  • *
  • Posts: 2217
  • Country: it
  • Gender: Male
Re: Reviews ---- Internet
« Reply #29 on: Jul 26, 2006, 05:38 PM »
I found this review in a blog among the others ( http://www.barbelith.com/topic/23265 ).
Since I find it interesting, I share it with you:

===============================

Saw Brokeback Mountain earlier today, and I'm still finding it difficult to articulate my thoughts on the film - not (I hope) because I've fallen into uncritical squeeeing or eughing but because I became caught up entirely in the huge emotional sweep of the thing to the extent that refocussing on the detail and (extremely minor) flaws feels somehow... to do it a disservice.

I honestly can't remember when last a film affected me as powerfully on such a visceral level. Xoc's the same, and I'm wondering to what extent we're reacting as gay men - because Brokeback Mountain didn't seem like a 'gay movie'. It felt more universal than that, a more classic tale of doomed love, albeit love which arguably didn't necessarily need to be doomed - hence the tragedy.

I'd been attempting to avoid as much of the media hype as possible, but I did read Proulx's short story beforehand. I'm glad I did, because it helped me in the early stages: rather than straining to glean plot from Ennis's mumbly monosyllables, I could sit back and let the slowly unfolding story - and particularly the beautiful visuals - wash over me. As Twist coaxes Ennis gradually out of his taciturn carapace, his dialogue becomes clearer. As Xoc says, though, it's the non-verbal stuff which truly dazzles, the glances and glances away, the oblique yet fluent body language in which car mirrors and cigarettes and hatbrims and belt buckles become extensions/expressions of the men's communication. Ennis, in particular, used his stetson as a defence mechanism, from the initial extraordinary silent 'pose-off' onwards.

Since so much was communicated visually, and in terms of the luminous Wyoming scenery itself, I really appreciated Lee's having taken time to unfold his story with languor - so the film's wide-open spaces reflected the achingly (frighteningly) gorgeous emptiness of the mountainside itself. It felt spare but unhurried. To a certain extent I can see Entity's problem with the paucity of explicit foreshadowing of the sex scene in the tent. I do think it's there, though, in the increasing physical and emotional intimacy ('stripping off') between the two men, and implicitly Ennis's talk of a coyote "with balls as big as apples" while rubbing down his own (presumably somewhat swollen) genitalia. There's definite sexual tension; it's just that Jack's so much more emotionally literate (and presumably one Kinsey numeral higher) than Ennis that he successfully manages the situation - avoiding frightening his nervy steer with overt attention - until events can no longer be resisted. When it does finally happen, it is a risk - Jack might get beaten to a pulp - but it's a (drunkenly) calculated risk which will be familiar to many gay men. I can absolutely recognise that inebriated sense of 'how the f*** did we get here?'. I think it works. There's a ring of truth (even to the sudden introduction of Jack's doubtless burnin' ring of fire...).

And yeah, it is close to rape, just as much of the open-air horseplay edges into fisticuffs. Isn't that part of the attraction, though? Like seasons on the mountain itself, Ennis and Jack's physicality is raw, elemental. It's a million miles away from 'gay' in any non-sexual sense.

Would saliva be sufficient lubricant? Possibly, I suppose, depending on the sizes involved. In the short story, there's also allusion to precum, in which case Ennis has either been dozing with a big, dripping stiffy or goes from zero to sixty pretty damn sharpish...

Although much has been made of the hott sex scene, I actually found myself more affected by the urgency and hunger of the 'four years later' moment. For me, that was the film's emotional pivot, and it puzzled me slightly when some of my fellow cinema-goers laughed at Alma's reaction. While Ennis's penchant for anal sex is clearly something of an ongoing pain in the ar** (ho ho) for her, witnessing the cowboy clinch is the point at which Alma truly glimpses the lie at the heart of her marriage. Or rather, the impossible compromise.

(Xoc wondered whether the people who tittered at that point cried at the end. Valid question.)

"Rampant misogyny"? Well yes, I guess so, in the sense that, in the context of Ennis and Jack's twenty-year love affair, wives and daughters are (at least notionally) symbols of duty, impediments - and part of Alma's/Lureen's pain is that they're able to recognise that. I thought pretty much all the women were intelligently drawn, and I don't think they were portrayed by Lee himself in a misogynistic way. From Alma Junior to old Ma Twist, they read the situation on at least some level, partly intuited The Problem With Men Like Ennis/Jack - even as they were drawn to the romantic outsider archetype. I agree that, at times, it seemed implicit that every cowboy marriage included a tacit understanding/denial of necessarily discreet man-to-man lust - although Jack's bar scene with the 'rodeo clown' suggests that any such understanding is by no means universal. One mustn't frighten the horses, particularly in Texas.

One might conceivably level a charge of misogyny at the portrayal of Lureen and her increasingly ludicrous hairdos, but I think this is part and parcel of the new What Jack Did scenes (Jack's outfits and hair - particularly his facial hair - also morphs through varying degrees of '70s/'80s dodginess). Her increasing chilliness, particularly in that final, devastating 'phone call, is betrayed by the little sound she makes in her throat when the origin of 'Brokeback Mountain' is revealed. As with the other women, she knows.

*sigh*

It's still weirdly difficult talking about these scenes without twinges of the massive emotional wrench I experienced in the cinema. During the latter part of the film, I found myself holding my breath while tears and snot welled. Ennis's visit to the Twists is almost unbearable. I've never particularly been one to romanticise the iconography of the American West, but in Lee's film I felt I could genuinely appreciate the savage beauty of the open country, and the hardship of those lifestyles which depend upon it.

We left the cinema utterly poleaxed - but neither of us felt unduly manipulated. Heath Ledger, in particular, deserves an Oscar. He's been quoted in the UK gay press as saying that, on viewing the finished article, he was proud of his acting for the very first time - and he's 100% justified in expressing this. Every lead was strong, but his was a shattering, career-defining performance. Outstanding.

( Ganesh  02:47 / 02.01.06 )
«Though you are far away | I am with you in every way | Close your eyes and you will see...»