<OT> Yet needed.
Dearest Kathy, the same matter happened ages ago, and we all agreed that this term was indeed offending. I don't believe any of the new members saw that since it was quite a few dozens of pages ago.
In the UK we call those tops: tank tops...but undershirt is fine as well.
Froggy.
and ps thank you for spotting it, I would have missed it since I was only going to look at the pix..
And back to Mr G.....the black and white pix are fantastic!!!!!
Thank you, Froggy, for responding. As I said in my later post, I apologize for having missed this yesterday. You are right in that the newer members did not get a chance to see the old discussion about this term. So it is good that kathy brought this up.
Thank you both. It's a little tricky, "censoring," as all you mods know, and whoever (Ethan?) decided on the "rules" for this forum in the first place. I wouldn't agree with censoring where not necessary (but who decides "necessary"?) but I think this example, no one can argue with? And I've said it before, but I agree with all the rules here, even though I have to go elsewhere to talk hot overt sex
But anyway, thanks for your support in this matter. I don't want to just be a nag.
kathy
