Author Topic: Jake's pix (Read 8121403 times)

Twisted · « **Reply #7921 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 02:50 AM »

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 02:29 PM

This is so so beautiful...

tpe · « **Reply #7922 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:11 AM »

Quote from: Hanna on Sep 25, 2006, 06:44 PM

Tom, that was a great collection!

...

I arrived home late last night so I haven't see Tom's pix yet. I shall not miss a chance to see them later today after work...

tpe · « **Reply #7923 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:13 AM »

Quote from: LuvJackNasty on Sep 25, 2006, 08:10 PM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 04:30 PM

Isn't that a Jakelick?

I think so.

tpe · « **Reply #7924 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:15 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:10 AM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 07:46 AM
Quote from: Twisted on Sep 24, 2006, 04:31 PM

There is a vague effect of motion here, no?

What is that? Like we're looking through scratched glass or something.

kahy

Yes, like scratched glass. Is this deliberate?

tpe · « **Reply #7925 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:20 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:16 AM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 08:06 AM
Quote from: Twisted on Sep 24, 2006, 04:44 PM

quis multa gracilis te puer in rosa perfusus liquidis urget odoribus grato, Pyrrha, sub antro?

Whatever this says, the words are almost as sensual as he is.

kathy

Milton's translation: What slender Youth bedew'd with liquid odours Courts thee on Roses in some pleasant Cave, Pyrrha...

tpe · « **Reply #7926 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:27 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:18 AM

I'm srue you meant to, but then got distracted by his torso, or maybe by his hand there...

kathy

He has such beautiful hands. But any part of him is enough to distract Erda's daughters from their spinning.

tpe · « **Reply #7927 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:28 AM »

Quote from: greenfrog on Sep 26, 2006, 12:23 AM

I don't know . . .

Hair care products?

tpe · « **Reply #7928 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:31 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:29 AM

Quote from: greenfrog on Sep 25, 2006, 01:33 AM

Well, the whole top-of-underwear showing is just an affectation of current fashion (though maybe it was so yesterday already). He certainly doesn't need to, but I don't mind that he does.

kathy

Yes, I certainly do not mind.

tpe · « **Reply #7929 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:35 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:30 AM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 08:45 AM
Quote from: greenfrog on Sep 25, 2006, 01:39 AM

What is it about him and a backdrop of reds and blues?

Red, blue and yellow in this one. Primary colors. And his own coloring a feast of subtlety with that primary background.

kathy

Yes, I do think it is his complexion -- it shimmers against a backdrop of primary colours. I also think his complexion is what makes him dazzling in a white shirt and black suit.

tpe · « **Reply #7930 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:38 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:32 AM

Quote from: Twisted on Sep 25, 2006, 03:04 AM

Oh, you're so right! I was all hung up on the beautiful blue, but the lighting on his face is just gorgeous!

kathy

I do love the beautiful blue. And his face has the mature look that is quite beautiful in the soft light...

tpe · « **Reply #7931 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:42 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:33 AM

[
Quote from: Twisted on Sep 25, 2006, 03:05 AM

The hair and the eyes and all...
Yep. And green tie and eyes, too. Perfect.

kathy
Quote

This is such a chraming and beautiful picture of the young Jake. He is such a visual delight.

tpe · « **Reply #7932 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 07:51 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:40 AM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 03:43 PM

I really love the pix from this series...

Me, too, very much. This one h as lovely pink and blue.

kathy

The pink of his skin is like balas rubies. The blue is finer than lapis lazuli. It is as blue as the robe of the Virgin. The pink is the color and fragrance of brabant roses...

tpe · « **Reply #7933 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:01 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:42 AM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 04:22 PM

Love this one in particular, not sure why -- it's the look through the camera to the viewer we've talked about...

kathy

I love it also because it shows him wearing his multiple rings.

tpe · « **Reply #7934 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:04 AM »

Quote from: ksxks on Sep 26, 2006, 12:46 AM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 04:40 PM

Tom, were you at Iheartjake today by chance? I was, though I'd never been there before...and there were some great pics, but I couldn't take the time to sae and post here. Most we've seen, but some not. (And I didn't like the paparazzi ones, truly, they bother me.)

Real quick, kind of OT: a friend lost ALL her computer stuff, serious crash. One thing devastated her very much was losing hundreds of Jake pix. Kathy to the rescue! I made a CD for her of my file of Jake pix. She is so relieved

kathy

Yes, IHJ has the most beautiful Jake pix. But I try to post pictures from other sources. Twisted has posted some very beautiful pix from IHJ.

tpe · « **Reply #7935 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:14 AM »

Quote from: greenfrog on Sep 26, 2006, 02:30 AM

I love this one very much. His eyes burn even in B&W.

tpe · « **Reply #7936 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:16 AM »

Quote from: Twisted on Sep 26, 2006, 02:50 AM

Quote from: tpe on Sep 25, 2006, 02:29 PM

This is so so beautiful...

So beautiful. Painfully so.

tpe · « **Reply #7937 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:38 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #7938 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:42 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #7939 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:44 AM »

Sorry, but I just wanted another look at some of the pix from the Donnie Darko Premiere series...

tpe · « **Reply #7940 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 08:54 AM »

Another Venice pic.

tpe · « **Reply #7941 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 09:00 AM »

tpe · « **Reply #7942 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:42 PM »

tpe · « **Reply #7943 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:44 PM »

tpe · « **Reply #7944 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:50 PM »

tpe · « **Reply #7945 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:52 PM »

tpe · « **Reply #7946 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:53 PM »

tpe · « **Reply #7947 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:54 PM »

tpe · « **Reply #7948 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:55 PM »

tpe · « **Reply #7949 on:** Sep 26, 2006, 04:56 PM »